Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

videotex.net

Videotex Global Networks

Page Load Speed

754 ms in total

First Response

186 ms

Resources Loaded

466 ms

Page Rendered

102 ms

videotex.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Videotex content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about videotex.net

Videotex Global Networks is a full service interactive agency, offering a suite of services that can be integrated together, complement you digital strategy or selected as stand-alone or plugin to you...

Visit videotex.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Videotex.net page load time and found that the first response time was 186 ms and then it took 568 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

videotex.net performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.359

30/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

videotex.net

186 ms

vidtex.css

92 ms

vgold.gif

81 ms

spacer.gif

76 ms

vidnet225.jpg

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Videotex.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (186 ms) belongs to the original domain Videotex.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.0 kB (55%)

Content Size

32.6 kB

After Optimization

14.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Videotex.net main page is 32.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 15.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 15.0 kB
  • After minification 14.2 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 434 B

  • Original 10.0 kB
  • After minification 9.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Videotex images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 7.6 kB
  • After minification 5.6 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videotex.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (22%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videotex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

videotex.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

videotex.net best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

videotex.net SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videotex.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Videotex.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Videotex. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: