Tools & Wizards About Us
vijohngroup.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

vijohngroup.com

Home - Buy Men's Grooming Products - Shaving Foam & Cream, Face Wash - Vi-john Group

Page Load Speed

21.8 sec in total

First Response

408 ms

Resources Loaded

21.1 sec

Page Rendered

294 ms

vijohngroup.com screenshot

About Website

Visit vijohngroup.com now to see the best up-to-date Vi John Group content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vijohngroup.com

Vi-John shave gel helps men to achieve a close, comfortable shave. We are key producer of skin care, hair care and oral product.

Visit vijohngroup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vijohngroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 408 ms and then it took 21.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

vijohngroup.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value440 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vijohngroup.com

408 ms

global.css

260 ms

style.css

140 ms

jquery.js

370 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Vijohngroup.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Googleadservices.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) relates to the external source Pensamedia.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 226.8 kB (33%)

Content Size

693.2 kB

After Optimization

466.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vijohngroup.com main page is 693.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 394.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 30.3 kB

  • Original 35.6 kB
  • After minification 23.1 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.5 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 394.5 kB
  • After minification 385.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vi John Group images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 131.2 kB

  • Original 204.6 kB
  • After minification 200.1 kB
  • After compression 73.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 131.2 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-97%

Potential reduce by 56.6 kB

  • Original 58.5 kB
  • After minification 8.8 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vijohngroup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.6 kB or 97% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (47%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vi John Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vijohngroup.com

vijohngroup.com

408 ms

global.css

global.css

260 ms

style.css

style.css

140 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

370 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

52 ms

sidepic-packages.js

sidepic-packages.js

141 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

139 ms

video.js

video.js

156 ms

skin.css

skin.css

201 ms

jquery.jcarousel.min.js

jquery.jcarousel.min.js

294 ms

wowslider.js

wowslider.js

204 ms

script.js

script.js

255 ms

%7Ba0A9000000Om8Yr%7D

%7Ba0A9000000Om8Yr%7D

20401 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

91 ms

%7Ba0A9000000Om8Yr%7D

%7Ba0A9000000Om8Yr%7D

20399 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

79 ms

css

css

36 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

119 ms

vulnerability-scanner-2.gif

vulnerability-scanner-2.gif

334 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

296 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

128 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

134 ms

logo-archies.png

logo-archies.png

186 ms

line.gif

line.gif

132 ms

banner-9.jpg

banner-9.jpg

221 ms

banner-8.jpg

banner-8.jpg

413 ms

banner-5.jpg

banner-5.jpg

302 ms

banner-4.jpg

banner-4.jpg

332 ms

top-shed.gif

top-shed.gif

198 ms

botom-shed.gif

botom-shed.gif

254 ms

new-product.gif

new-product.gif

300 ms

aero.gif

aero.gif

331 ms

pic1.gif

pic1.gif

397 ms

pic2.gif

pic2.gif

406 ms

pic3.gif

pic3.gif

405 ms

pic4.gif

pic4.gif

439 ms

pic6.gif

pic6.gif

421 ms

pic7.gif

pic7.gif

495 ms

pic8.gif

pic8.gif

501 ms

global-tab.png

global-tab.png

497 ms

promising-brand-th.jpg

promising-brand-th.jpg

500 ms

promising-brand-th1.jpg

promising-brand-th1.jpg

546 ms

bot-line.gif

bot-line.gif

548 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

643 ms

dotline2.gif

dotline2.gif

541 ms

arrow-gl.png

arrow-gl.png

542 ms

arrow-gr.png

arrow-gr.png

543 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

544 ms

collect

collect

37 ms

JLyezu7kk9U

JLyezu7kk9U

116 ms

www-embed-player-vfl5foy2V.css

www-embed-player-vfl5foy2V.css

215 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

303 ms

base.js

base.js

809 ms

veBs87dwiCXgZb9CwomBYiW1hyWXgp0ohA3Vj3gnbUg.js

veBs87dwiCXgZb9CwomBYiW1hyWXgp0ohA3Vj3gnbUg.js

234 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

287 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

278 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

340 ms

130 ms

83 ms

62 ms

57 ms

21 ms

91 ms

93 ms

Accessibility Review

vijohngroup.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

vijohngroup.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

vijohngroup.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vijohngroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vijohngroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

vijohngroup.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vi John Group. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: