6 sec in total
498 ms
4.3 sec
1.3 sec
Visit vilitek.ru now to see the best up-to-date Vilitek content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vilitek.ru
Вы хотите купить оборудование для проведения лабораторных исследований по выгодным ценам? Мы занимаемся поставками исследовательских оборудований, производством и проектированиям оборудования для лабо...
Visit vilitek.ruWe analyzed Vilitek.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 498 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
vilitek.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value23,910 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.123
84/100
15%
Value30.9 s
0/100
10%
498 ms
650 ms
170 ms
189 ms
211 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Vilitek.ru, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.bitrix24.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 263.9 kB (49%)
540.5 kB
276.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Vilitek.ru main page is 540.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 228.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 173.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 173.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vilitek needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.0 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 68.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 68.9 kB or 36% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vilitek.ru has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (48%)
56
29
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vilitek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vilitek.ru
498 ms
vilitek.ru
650 ms
core.min.css
170 ms
css
189 ms
font-awesome.min.css
211 ms
page_8abed2a00667933c526213d78cbb25f0_v1.css
310 ms
template_d495fda453274f33b41cbc49ae360832_v1.css
555 ms
js
238 ms
core.min.js
912 ms
kernel_main_v1.js
901 ms
kernel_main_polyfill_customevent_v1.js
898 ms
dexie.bitrix.bundle.min.js
902 ms
core_ls.min.js
899 ms
core_frame_cache.min.js
899 ms
jquery.min.js
199 ms
script.js
900 ms
template_c94e4a8df44e90aa0d29aeae8e4efb0a_v1.js
904 ms
api.js
227 ms
vilitek.ru
764 ms
spisok.png
741 ms
star.png
741 ms
cop.png
743 ms
loader_2_i1wx0u.js
1582 ms
button_search.jpg
177 ms
blue_block.png
567 ms
menu.png
567 ms
4d47e2c22dd0f865bcff8de53af9ad5b.png
569 ms
b.png
568 ms
c543b6bd25764d315097837c7f67d21e.png
569 ms
196b4d782e760a627b4021486518077d.png
570 ms
3b5e9cfff3ebe4e721993614c1aa2646.png
571 ms
a05cbfcbc9352187044680834a5dd23c.png
571 ms
e7a6a8686ba4b9969c0f0053bfb42a30.png
572 ms
695e252db79f87fd0a80d2413d3393ce.png
572 ms
fd9c86f8d6b0fe12e75ab8aca75ab4f3.png
572 ms
058e068583bb3997f87aaae978c3b220.png
573 ms
6550e4ee6ea22d9b015214b32cffa511.png
634 ms
fd3f49482f63d684e6caa5659167539d.png
635 ms
baffce70c37567dd78e6c26a3b672317.png
633 ms
1ef5d16a72747f012c75d0a9321c5278.png
633 ms
e3b35308cb3d27752b208cb9f9954d2e.png
633 ms
856b7968687a20b59ee7a243e08a36ea.png
634 ms
6b8e20faf24715950032764270d5a83f.png
740 ms
578a5a40cce5d157f09505a8a9741115.png
739 ms
0db715760ba8d4c1c782d6e5aef99676.png
738 ms
3bf369b27505e77af9662f66535d5027.png
738 ms
recaptcha__en.js
330 ms
analytics.js
247 ms
watch.js
36 ms
call.tracker.js
1155 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4kaVQ.woff
211 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4kaVQ.woff
289 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4kaVQ.woff
526 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVQexg.woff
527 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
122 ms
collect
311 ms
collect
313 ms
collect
239 ms
fallback
85 ms
fallback__ltr.css
77 ms
collect
125 ms
css
26 ms
logo_48.png
16 ms
ga-audiences
26 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
23 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
23 ms
call.tracker.js
568 ms
polyfill.js
691 ms
vilitek.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
vilitek.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
vilitek.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vilitek.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vilitek.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vilitek.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vilitek. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: