8.1 sec in total
3 sec
4.8 sec
310 ms
Click here to check amazing Vintagewedding content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vintagewedding.com
Find fabulous, unique vintage wedding & special occasion dresses, bridal hats & veils with detailed descriptions, fast shipping, and priced to please.
Visit vintagewedding.comWe analyzed Vintagewedding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
vintagewedding.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value3.7 s
58/100
25%
Value3.3 s
91/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value4.0 s
87/100
10%
2996 ms
73 ms
139 ms
22 ms
139 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Vintagewedding.com, 18% (15 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net and 12% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Vintagewedding.com.
Page size can be reduced by 530.4 kB (38%)
1.4 MB
877.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Vintagewedding.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 728.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.4 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vintagewedding images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 321.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 321.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 148.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vintagewedding.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 148.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (51%)
81
40
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vintagewedding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vintagewedding.com
2996 ms
style.css
73 ms
xyz_cfm_shortcode_style.css
139 ms
jquery-ui.css
22 ms
styles.css
139 ms
style.responsive.css
134 ms
jquery-ui.css
140 ms
colorbox.css
139 ms
select2.min.css
11 ms
style.css
142 ms
jquery.js
325 ms
script.js
211 ms
script.responsive.js
214 ms
core.min.js
209 ms
datepicker.min.js
209 ms
jquery.form.min.js
210 ms
scripts.js
280 ms
widget.min.js
283 ms
colorbox.js
284 ms
tabs.min.js
277 ms
button.min.js
279 ms
autoheight.js
361 ms
select2.min.js
7 ms
position.min.js
403 ms
tooltip.min.js
361 ms
functions.js
361 ms
wp-checkout.js
402 ms
jquery.ajaxupload.js
406 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
387 ms
homepage-image.png
460 ms
item-center.png
129 ms
1940s-unique-scalloped-front-waist-peplum-dro-1424295527-2yjrqcmt2l7axinubqdhj4.jpg
176 ms
1950s-ivory-lace-bodice-sleeves-w-illusion-1429730984-2yyephv6a0fz7hpnfal4hs.jpg
130 ms
1960s-chiffon-mid-century-fitted-waist-a-flar-1399061415-2wnt8sr0nyvyv8v6m2tpfk.jpg
130 ms
scat.png
174 ms
sm_dress.png
224 ms
sm_spec.png
245 ms
sm_veils.png
207 ms
sm_holders.png
315 ms
sm_acc.png
223 ms
paypal__secure.jpg
341 ms
all.js
174 ms
ga.js
63 ms
page.png
277 ms
header.jpg
524 ms
hbar-active.png
298 ms
hbar.png
346 ms
spacer.gif
366 ms
bk-head.png
366 ms
footer.png
382 ms
checkout_dashicons.woff
370 ms
__utm.gif
50 ms
overlay.png
328 ms
likebox.php
434 ms
13 ms
xd_arbiter.php
125 ms
xd_arbiter.php
251 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
172 ms
kTub4bakEmM.css
212 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
293 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
355 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
280 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
289 ms
1233401_667327686611407_261401863_n.jpg
205 ms
1236132_667328593277983_1494010027_n.png
243 ms
12494979_1071610339567666_8723943733264605609_n.jpg
283 ms
12814030_10207124776332056_4553726176259305548_n.jpg
313 ms
11667251_1117548838258963_5839341706999105913_n.jpg
322 ms
12813923_10153953184228050_5669965148380487665_n.jpg
321 ms
12801172_10209242703607260_6484412684864247453_n.jpg
323 ms
12592311_10206886588015518_8167171055586848147_n.jpg
321 ms
1897007_802481239766661_1195777669_n.jpg
323 ms
11260703_897237020354462_1013563455749436353_n.jpg
350 ms
12541061_1139374162741564_5870985171213836068_n.jpg
359 ms
12573856_10205163935728926_427616231911995735_n.jpg
361 ms
11813340_10206489484971828_6652395348604820597_n.jpg
361 ms
11986428_109219336112636_1075507219818128752_n.jpg
362 ms
1656110_1561423237518947_4735401899821197282_n.jpg
363 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
41 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
42 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
43 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
83 ms
vintagewedding.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
vintagewedding.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
vintagewedding.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vintagewedding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Vintagewedding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vintagewedding.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vintagewedding. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: