Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

vistagate.com

Liverton Networks | Liverton Technology

Page Load Speed

10 sec in total

First Response

2.7 sec

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

593 ms

vistagate.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Vistagate content for New Zealand. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vistagate.com

By Liverton Limited

Visit vistagate.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vistagate.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vistagate.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value440 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vistagate.com

2738 ms

jsbrotate.css

209 ms

testimonials_shortcode.css

398 ms

ab-tweet-scroller.css

401 ms

portfolio_shortcode.css

402 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Vistagate.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Vistagate.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (68%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

463.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Vistagate.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 951.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 46.9 kB

  • Original 59.4 kB
  • After minification 58.3 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 157.0 kB
  • After minification 150.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vistagate images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 690.1 kB

  • Original 951.8 kB
  • After minification 838.2 kB
  • After compression 261.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 690.1 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 256.5 kB

  • Original 295.4 kB
  • After minification 235.0 kB
  • After compression 38.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vistagate.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 256.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (84%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vistagate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

vistagate.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

vistagate.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vistagate.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vistagate.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vistagate.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vistagate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: