Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

vitalchoice.com

Wild-Caught Seafood, Fish, & Salmon Delivery | Vital Choice

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

99 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

920 ms

vitalchoice.com screenshot

About Website

Visit vitalchoice.com now to see the best up-to-date Vital Choice content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vitalchoice.com

Vital Choice is a trusted source for salmon delivery and organic seafood, with some of the world's finest wild-caught seafood delivery and organic salmon, harvested from well-managed wild fisheri...

Visit vitalchoice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vitalchoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 99 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vitalchoice.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,720 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vitalchoice.com

99 ms

home.asp

153 ms

1571690011.js

91 ms

vital-choice-prod.js

56 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.9.custom.css

174 ms

Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Vitalchoice.com, 4% (5 requests) were made to Google.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Js.bronto.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Vitalchoice.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (31%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Vitalchoice.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 68.4 kB

  • Original 88.6 kB
  • After minification 78.9 kB
  • After compression 20.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 160.6 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vital Choice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 818.7 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 374.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 818.7 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 105.1 kB

  • Original 121.1 kB
  • After minification 74.2 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vitalchoice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 105.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (46%)

Requests Now

121

After Optimization

65

The browser has sent 121 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vital Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

vitalchoice.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

vitalchoice.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

vitalchoice.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vitalchoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Vitalchoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vital Choice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: