898 ms in total
102 ms
726 ms
70 ms
Welcome to vitales.com homepage info - get ready to check Vitales best content right away, or after learning these important things about vitales.com
Visit vitales.comWe analyzed Vitales.com page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 796 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
vitales.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value3.8 s
56/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value450 ms
62/100
30%
Value0.021
100/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
102 ms
55 ms
59 ms
54 ms
56 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Vitales.com, 34% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (328 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 242.7 kB (42%)
577.0 kB
334.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Vitales.com main page is 577.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 323.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 239.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 239.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 623 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vitales images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (44%)
25
14
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vitales. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.vitales.com
102 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
55 ms
minified.js
59 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
54 ms
polyfill.min.js
56 ms
thunderbolt-commons.67e14581.bundle.min.js
142 ms
main.5ab8d530.bundle.min.js
142 ms
lodash.min.js
139 ms
react.production.min.js
137 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
142 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
140 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
158 ms
30257c0ea7e66e8c05123d8a7d001649.wix_mp
146 ms
bundle.min.js
69 ms
84770f_5d6c117b8b809115ac0c53950a223c4f.png
156 ms
ec810a_c1f948f93e70f13b646c0f427a392df9.gif
57 ms
75c2f6_dd3ec80d0ebf46cfb8d1bcac35763c05~mv2.jpg
235 ms
75c2f6_cfad11495c52407780c26b21d56e4d83~mv2.jpg
250 ms
75c2f6_0e94c58c331c474aa568644ed3a941f9.jpg
328 ms
84770f_94a73ed6190ab69d0fa01f81bfb01cac.png
182 ms
84770f_0cc901a5a1d19e0be85b5f0582fb51e3.png
204 ms
84770f_7cd530548ea21fff494305fd51fe6e85.png
259 ms
142 ms
138 ms
132 ms
134 ms
132 ms
131 ms
207 ms
199 ms
198 ms
193 ms
197 ms
192 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
22 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
10 ms
right-arrow.svg
7 ms
vitales.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
vitales.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
vitales.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vitales.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vitales.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vitales.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vitales. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: