3.8 sec in total
488 ms
2.8 sec
513 ms
Visit vivol.fr now to see the best up-to-date Vivol content for Netherlands and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vivol.fr
vivol
Visit vivol.frWe analyzed Vivol.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 488 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
vivol.fr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value4.8 s
66/100
10%
Value2,430 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.844
4/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
488 ms
88 ms
261 ms
261 ms
173 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Vivol.fr, 13% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 10% (8 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (692 ms) belongs to the original domain Vivol.fr.
Page size can be reduced by 925.1 kB (55%)
1.7 MB
752.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Vivol.fr main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 675.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 119.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vivol needs image optimization as it can save up to 119.2 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 484.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 484.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 290.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivol.fr needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 290.9 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (64%)
72
26
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vivol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vivol.fr
488 ms
ea7d7729514a37307000f172badc90dd.css
88 ms
prototype.js
261 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
261 ms
noconflict.js
173 ms
ccard.js
173 ms
validation.js
176 ms
builder.js
175 ms
effects.js
259 ms
dragdrop.js
256 ms
controls.js
306 ms
slider.js
304 ms
js.js
342 ms
form.js
340 ms
translate.js
343 ms
cookies.js
339 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
344 ms
selectivizr.js
349 ms
matchMedia.js
422 ms
matchMedia.addListener.js
423 ms
enquire.js
424 ms
app.js
427 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
430 ms
jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js
435 ms
slideshow.js
502 ms
imagesloaded.js
506 ms
minicart.js
508 ms
DataLayer.js
509 ms
jquery.unveil.js
514 ms
eeb244ea09e3a35d56dcb93bfa076041.css
692 ms
css
25 ms
performance.js
580 ms
ga.js
44 ms
logofr.jpg
125 ms
transparent.png
127 ms
webshop-trustmark-small.png
125 ms
webshop-trustmark-big.png
208 ms
sdk.js
205 ms
sprite-general.d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e.png
198 ms
tuin.jpg
339 ms
icon-double-angle-right-white.png
332 ms
kantoor.jpg
166 ms
huis.jpg
167 ms
transport.jpg
234 ms
rubber.jpg
392 ms
doormat.jpg
320 ms
delivery.jpg
318 ms
opc-ajax-loader.gif
307 ms
__utm.gif
85 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
74 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
75 ms
lILlYDvubYemzYzN7GbLkInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
74 ms
PIPMHY90P7jtyjpXuZ2cLKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
75 ms
gtm.js
149 ms
collect
97 ms
150 ms
xd_arbiter.php
162 ms
xd_arbiter.php
263 ms
ga-audiences
67 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
page.php
213 ms
fuz5iiRHS6l.css
172 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
252 ms
3o1espZ6Mhb.js
292 ms
nfTYZZc0iSn.js
372 ms
1545791_803073833042243_1733989400_n.png
285 ms
1385248_746640158685611_1953169330_n.png
323 ms
9558_933916443352908_1006902834917718944_n.jpg
399 ms
10141_593044460726828_118422776_n.jpg
408 ms
10366030_127021511022143_8913964119869009928_n.jpg
404 ms
12705406_1524767924490490_2851328773705158579_n.jpg
407 ms
12109149_517283485091472_2861111614616037846_n.jpg
402 ms
11986464_1073062862706472_8187327757110432323_n.jpg
407 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
49 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
49 ms
R9a_DtVRZgv.js
41 ms
cUDgRFxaoIk.js
41 ms
0JBr1QHp8Gi.js
43 ms
kDOzhTr2W91.js
80 ms
vivol.fr accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
vivol.fr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
vivol.fr SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivol.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vivol.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vivol.fr
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vivol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: