6 sec in total
375 ms
4.8 sec
892 ms
Click here to check amazing Vivo Sync content for Brazil. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vivosync.com.br
Visit vivosync.com.brWe analyzed Vivosync.com.br page load time and found that the first response time was 375 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
vivosync.com.br performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value18.0 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value850 ms
34/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
375 ms
640 ms
371 ms
620 ms
373 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Vivosync.com.br, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Vivosync.com.br.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (46%)
2.3 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Vivosync.com.br main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.3 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vivo Sync images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 668.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 668.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 251.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivosync.com.br needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 251.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (32%)
74
50
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vivo Sync. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vivosync.com.br
375 ms
640 ms
fonts.css
371 ms
general.css
620 ms
jquery.colorbox.css
373 ms
jquery.js
739 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
380 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
475 ms
jquery.maskinput.js
490 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
491 ms
jquery-ui.js
1578 ms
geral.js
598 ms
home.js
608 ms
chat_info.js
1011 ms
analytics.js
86 ms
header_bg.png
146 ms
logo_vivo.png
137 ms
logo_sync.png
275 ms
bg_user.png
141 ms
bg_password.png
143 ms
btn_login.png
143 ms
bt_ok.png
272 ms
menu_bg.png
261 ms
menu_bg_l.png
260 ms
proteja_e_compartilhe.jpg
261 ms
carrossel_image.png
729 ms
adquira_ja.png
340 ms
carrossel_on.png
340 ms
carrossel_off.png
377 ms
p_img_1.png
490 ms
bg_box_3.png
378 ms
p_img_2.png
935 ms
p_img_3.png
576 ms
p_img_4.png
850 ms
faq_ab.png
490 ms
aba_right.png
608 ms
pass_esq.png
610 ms
pass_dir.png
695 ms
box_2.png
728 ms
music_icon.png
730 ms
file_icon.png
815 ms
photos_icon.png
845 ms
bt_adqj_s.png
848 ms
box_1.png
849 ms
req_mobile.png
935 ms
req_computer.png
964 ms
officinaserif-bold-webfont.woff
1085 ms
officinaserif-book-webfont.woff
1091 ms
bg_faq_topic.png
930 ms
faq_fc.png
1011 ms
jFCETxzfIQc
79 ms
collect
37 ms
bg_footer_menu.png
988 ms
collect
85 ms
telefonica_logo.jpg
981 ms
vivoFooter.jpg
983 ms
1.png
1181 ms
2.png
1065 ms
3.png
1091 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
37 ms
www-embed-player.js
62 ms
ga-audiences
90 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
55 ms
ad_status.js
112 ms
4.png
1087 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
105 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
106 ms
5.png
1083 ms
6.png
960 ms
7.png
1283 ms
8.png
1192 ms
9.png
1118 ms
10.png
1441 ms
11.png
1195 ms
12.png
1078 ms
13.png
1082 ms
14.png
1084 ms
15.png
1001 ms
16.png
1053 ms
17.png
1082 ms
vivosync.com.br accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
vivosync.com.br best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
vivosync.com.br SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivosync.com.br can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Vivosync.com.br main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vivosync.com.br
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vivo Sync. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: