7.4 sec in total
1.5 sec
5.8 sec
212 ms
Welcome to vrad.nl homepage info - get ready to check Vrad best content right away, or after learning these important things about vrad.nl
ICT, Office 365, Automatisering, Server Problemen, Migratie, Security Opties, Server Vervangen of Herstellen, Nakijken Netwerk
Visit vrad.nlWe analyzed Vrad.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
vrad.nl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
58/100
10%
Value3.1 s
76/100
25%
Value4.6 s
71/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.33
34/100
15%
Value5.4 s
71/100
10%
1485 ms
27 ms
38 ms
47 ms
421 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Vrad.nl, 36% (39 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 13% (14 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Vrad.nl.
Page size can be reduced by 206.7 kB (60%)
343.5 kB
136.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Vrad.nl main page is 343.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 260.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vrad images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 172.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 172.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (70%)
100
30
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vrad. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.vrad.nl
1485 ms
css
27 ms
css
38 ms
css
47 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
421 ms
font-awesome.min.css
340 ms
designer_css.php
946 ms
styles.css
174 ms
slider-plus-lightbox-style.css
277 ms
jquery.lbox.css
255 ms
wprmenu.css
342 ms
css
35 ms
style.css
342 ms
style.css
655 ms
css
33 ms
genericons.css
509 ms
wpgmza_style.css
429 ms
jquery.js
643 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
493 ms
slider-plus-lightbox-js.js
605 ms
jquery.lbox.min.js
584 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
600 ms
jquery.sidr.js
671 ms
wprmenu.js
687 ms
loader.php
697 ms
easy-columns.css
727 ms
api.js
45 ms
jquery.form.min.js
588 ms
scripts.js
599 ms
navigation.js
625 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
623 ms
wp-embed.min.js
654 ms
jquery-1.10.2.js
37 ms
plusone.js
213 ms
recaptcha__en.js
183 ms
logo-VRAD-bv-WEB.png
153 ms
pijltje%20vrad.png
152 ms
scan.png
218 ms
LeesVerder-e1444726111924.png
153 ms
AchtergrondVRAD.png
1030 ms
aanvragen.png
153 ms
contact1.png
238 ms
facebook.png
238 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
28 ms
HkF_qI1x_noxlxhrhMQYEKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
44 ms
LqowQDslGv4DmUBAfWa2Vw.ttf
57 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
56 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
57 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
57 ms
likebox.php
285 ms
collect
44 ms
collect
72 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
5 ms
hDvwL1_H7g-.css
91 ms
56WNbrUYLbL.css
111 ms
yZ--Yu0PDbV.css
130 ms
GN27K_co9Wc.css
145 ms
QD6_ejUFoCN.css
187 ms
xxJgcoj8mOR.css
178 ms
gbh6x73jsGH.css
161 ms
khX_DTDmaMU.css
148 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
191 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
206 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
202 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
203 ms
njO1TPvGzoR.js
202 ms
OloiM1PZafe.js
203 ms
LTv6ZK-5zxz.js
230 ms
1FCa-btixu2.js
214 ms
Oagsvfb4VWi.js
215 ms
pObvZSrFc_4.js
217 ms
Kt4tkgSRvHH.js
213 ms
H3EKDTObx05.js
214 ms
eR-qA8bp1RM.js
218 ms
1QuX41zDRrx.js
220 ms
IjqSyiwKeaX.js
262 ms
rBxSIHk4zIe.js
265 ms
n6VgtouijQL.js
264 ms
7BE0CZr3HTs.js
264 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
272 ms
_UYztdBNTjs.js
264 ms
-7JBD_ybv4q.js
283 ms
1897924_671063699616798_656706789_n.png
220 ms
12494745_1009598212430010_2550521322461858202_n.jpg
241 ms
11311_845450122207603_802101367247378736_n.jpg
283 ms
1656196_1399783330280954_484951318_n.jpg
332 ms
11258148_444673375709612_7327662970895280205_n.jpg
311 ms
320680_110863625693574_1192996978_n.jpg
296 ms
10429464_314197705423205_3886355596014255350_n.jpg
415 ms
971579_155945451268439_431485868_n.jpg
333 ms
10955334_1036457513077413_2156016001289835657_n.jpg
322 ms
12799224_1035134393209725_5255510008721290848_n.jpg
448 ms
12321419_1035134389876392_3040630859788451957_n.jpg
405 ms
12814580_1035134396543058_7252062570616892055_n.jpg
377 ms
12799060_1035134426543055_4194709404677476028_n.jpg
406 ms
12672717_1033568603366304_773298617_n.jpg
404 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
90 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
90 ms
QDwYpIaRyfG.png
90 ms
sSwLTfB7PfP.png
91 ms
l5aPruN9xMM.png
90 ms
K00K-UgnsKu.png
91 ms
b8XhdWI9eAN.js
39 ms
gxbPuQdXIZP.png
27 ms
K_65vAc89SX.png
25 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
20 ms
vrad.nl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
vrad.nl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
vrad.nl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vrad.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vrad.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vrad.nl
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vrad. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: