5.1 sec in total
1 sec
2.9 sec
1.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Charleston Word Camp content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about charleston.wordcamp.org
Visit charleston.wordcamp.orgWe analyzed Charleston.wordcamp.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
charleston.wordcamp.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
1031 ms
73 ms
144 ms
215 ms
222 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Charleston.wordcamp.org, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source 2014.charleston.wordcamp.org.
Page size can be reduced by 452.9 kB (27%)
1.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Charleston.wordcamp.org main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Charleston Word Camp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 192.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 192.8 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 151.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Charleston.wordcamp.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 151.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (26%)
76
56
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charleston Word Camp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
2014.charleston.wordcamp.org
1031 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
73 ms
font-awesome.min.css
144 ms
front-end.css
215 ms
shortcodes.css
222 ms
css
57 ms
genericons.css
290 ms
style.css
230 ms
camptix.css
227 ms
jetpack.css
219 ms
jquery.js
425 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
290 ms
2014.charleston.wordcamp.org
349 ms
lhv2lro.js
193 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
287 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
288 ms
masonry.min.js
358 ms
front-end.js
358 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
39 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
358 ms
functions.js
358 ms
wp-embed.min.js
407 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
508 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
506 ms
church.jpg
459 ms
logo-2014.png
340 ms
search-icon.png
98 ms
post-promo.jpg
390 ms
WCCHS-3373-150x150.jpg
313 ms
WCCHS-3273-150x150.jpg
313 ms
WCCHS-3432-150x150.jpg
337 ms
WCCHS-3329-150x150.jpg
336 ms
WCCHS-3319-150x150.jpg
336 ms
WCCHS-3109-150x150.jpg
406 ms
WCCHS-3225-150x150.jpg
402 ms
WCCHS-3148-150x150.jpg
403 ms
WCCHS-3291-150x150.jpg
472 ms
WCCHS-3313-150x150.jpg
467 ms
WCCHS-3284-150x150.jpg
481 ms
WCCHS-3323-150x150.jpg
482 ms
WCCHS-3266-150x150.jpg
484 ms
WCCHS-3130-150x150.jpg
533 ms
WCCHS-3386-150x150.jpg
547 ms
WCCHS-3426-150x150.jpg
551 ms
WCCHS-3437-150x150.jpg
563 ms
WCCHS-3322-150x150.jpg
561 ms
WCCHS-3416-150x150.jpg
562 ms
WCCHS-3259-150x150.jpg
612 ms
WCCHS-3441-150x150.jpg
627 ms
WCCHS-3151-150x150.jpg
630 ms
WCCHS-3117-150x150.jpg
642 ms
WCCHS-3395-150x150.jpg
644 ms
WCCHS-3248-150x150.jpg
642 ms
WCCHS-3114-150x150.jpg
692 ms
WCCHS-3270-150x150.jpg
704 ms
WCCHS-3327-150x150.jpg
710 ms
WordCamp-Post-Image-Tony-Perez.jpg
865 ms
WordCamp-Post-Image-Parking.jpg
822 ms
WordCamp-Post-Image-Suzette-Franck.jpg
750 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGAlZ1PukdtTN2z-JxSzbe8.ttf
262 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlFzCdIATDt8zXO3QNtzVeJ8.ttf
285 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEBls_1aQwi4AfipSOlE3SU.ttf
286 ms
Genericons.svg
718 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
11 ms
WordCamp-Post-Image-WCCHS.gif
489 ms
WordCamp-Post-Image-InMotion.gif
487 ms
WordCamp-Post-Image-Jason-Finneyfrock.jpg
679 ms
media-temple.png
533 ms
wcchs-sponsors-wiredtree.png
608 ms
wcchs-sponsors-bluehost.png
541 ms
wcchs-sponsors-dreamhost.png
609 ms
codepoet.png
560 ms
wpml.png
547 ms
wcchs-sponsors-disqus.png
556 ms
cofc-it.png
687 ms
wcchs-sponsors-feedblitz.png
571 ms
wcchs-sponsors-woothemes.png
560 ms
wcchs-sponsors-boomtown.png
626 ms
wcchs-sponsors-southpoint.png
626 ms
wcchs-sponsors-sparc.png
659 ms
wcchs-sponsors-csa.png
620 ms
wcchs-sponsors-inmotion.png
573 ms
charleston.wordcamp.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
charleston.wordcamp.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
charleston.wordcamp.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charleston.wordcamp.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Charleston.wordcamp.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
charleston.wordcamp.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Charleston Word Camp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: