4.6 sec in total
9 ms
1.9 sec
2.7 sec
Welcome to digiphile.wordpress.com homepage info - get ready to check Digiphile Wordp Re Ss best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about digiphile.wordpress.com
"We're already living in the future. It's just not evenly distrbuted yet."
Visit digiphile.wordpress.comWe analyzed Digiphile.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Digiphile.wordpress.com rating and web reputation
digiphile.wordpress.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value5.0 s
63/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
9 ms
332 ms
82 ms
93 ms
91 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Digiphile.wordpress.com, 15% (13 requests) were made to Digiphile.files.wordpress.com and 11% (10 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Digiphile.files.wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 830.3 kB (26%)
3.3 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Digiphile.wordpress.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digiphile Wordp Re Ss images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 477.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 477.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 234.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digiphile.wordpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 234.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (47%)
78
41
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digiphile Wordp Re Ss. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
digiphile.wordpress.com
9 ms
digiphile.wordpress.com
332 ms
82 ms
93 ms
style.css
91 ms
gprofiles.js
282 ms
wpgroho.js
88 ms
90 ms
jetpack-carousel.css
86 ms
tiled-gallery.css
88 ms
89 ms
widgets.js
282 ms
83 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
150 ms
w.js
91 ms
merriweather.css
38 ms
cropped-1-10-2010-iphone-food-grabs-007.jpg
405 ms
qAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
50 ms
bubble.png
48 ms
twitter-gid.gif
508 ms
ucUMdx2QxPc
407 ms
k4ZItrTKDPnSU.gif
833 ms
resize
407 ms
67999725371e18a29c8ad79bb80816bd_400x400.jpeg
493 ms
view.gif
358 ms
feed-icon16x16.png
146 ms
rss.png
322 ms
21793034063_74fc83fde5_t.jpg
302 ms
15805115620_c3013b7465_t.jpg
145 ms
JSDrm0Tp_normal.jpeg
321 ms
widgets.js
307 ms
12801605_866767204565_474458777501763275_n.jpg
348 ms
twitter-gid.gif
924 ms
rhinobird_tv___video_in_real_time.jpg
388 ms
img_4544.png
407 ms
img_4551.png
1288 ms
img_4553.png
491 ms
img_4555.png
480 ms
img_4542.png
482 ms
img_4547.png
483 ms
img_4552.png
538 ms
img_4545-0.png
1348 ms
img_4431.jpg
489 ms
cabinet.png
34 ms
img_4416.gif
392 ms
15929492136_d2edbff757_t.jpg
134 ms
15891563706_56cd29c5fb_t.jpg
134 ms
22414113295_fb0b3f396e_t.jpg
293 ms
0002e3a3fdca44e970af23951095fecf
292 ms
Noticons.svg
181 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
11 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
193 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
241 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
240 ms
274 ms
hovercard.css
179 ms
services.css
215 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
171 ms
tweet.2c548e167cf5bdb0bd941e41896f257d.js
205 ms
208 ms
g.gif
200 ms
g.gif
198 ms
g.gif
198 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
105 ms
www-embed-player.js
127 ms
base.js
161 ms
syndication
209 ms
tweets.json
279 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
46 ms
ad_status.js
52 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
41 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
44 ms
link
45 ms
track.php
103 ms
1f44d.png
73 ms
tweet.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
31 ms
tweet.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
50 ms
DMcaoVbW_normal.jpg
42 ms
qvTvxmCX_normal.png
68 ms
dHP5KjbL_normal.jpeg
128 ms
Cc-G35gWAAEHmru.jpg
194 ms
zobTvve0_normal.jpeg
128 ms
FSAIjKRl_normal.jpg
130 ms
zRNgzbWC_normal.jpeg
131 ms
A2wMuA4CUAAA6_t.jpg
211 ms
CX_R94ZUkAACYLE.jpg
202 ms
jot.html
31 ms
botd.gif
58 ms
digiphile.wordpress.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
digiphile.wordpress.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
digiphile.wordpress.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digiphile.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digiphile.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digiphile.wordpress.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Digiphile Wordp Re Ss. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: