801 ms in total
11 ms
649 ms
141 ms
Welcome to edward2011.wordpress.com homepage info - get ready to check Edward2011 Word Press best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about edward2011.wordpress.com
Just another WordPress.com site
Visit edward2011.wordpress.comWe analyzed Edward2011.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 790 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
edward2011.wordpress.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value18.3 s
0/100
25%
Value3.6 s
86/100
10%
Value2,570 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.065
97/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
11 ms
252 ms
98 ms
105 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Edward2011.wordpress.com, 35% (13 requests) were made to S1.wp.com and 19% (7 requests) were made to S2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (252 ms) belongs to the original domain Edward2011.wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 425.1 kB (53%)
806.3 kB
381.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Edward2011.wordpress.com main page is 806.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 496.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 503 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Edward2011 Word Press images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 369.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 369.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edward2011.wordpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (58%)
31
13
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edward2011 Word Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
edward2011.wordpress.com
11 ms
edward2011.wordpress.com
252 ms
98 ms
105 ms
global.css
105 ms
106 ms
style.css
93 ms
gprofiles.js
197 ms
wpgroho.js
101 ms
100 ms
jetpack-carousel.css
103 ms
tiled-gallery.css
101 ms
101 ms
widgets.js
187 ms
101 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
149 ms
w.js
122 ms
merriweather.css
12 ms
cropped-edward-1001.jpg
182 ms
header-repeat.png
11 ms
header.png
22 ms
body.png
21 ms
date-wide.png
24 ms
hr.png
22 ms
footer-repeat.gif
25 ms
global-print.css
3 ms
Noticons.svg
58 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
56 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
57 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
58 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
57 ms
44 ms
hovercard.css
45 ms
services.css
75 ms
g.gif
26 ms
g.gif
24 ms
g.gif
24 ms
edward2011.wordpress.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
edward2011.wordpress.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
edward2011.wordpress.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
RO
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edward2011.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Romanian language. Our system also found out that Edward2011.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
edward2011.wordpress.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Edward2011 Word Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: