Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

pakkitab.wordpress.com

pakkitab | 4 out of 5 dentists recommend this WordPress.com site

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

886 ms

Page Rendered

303 ms

pakkitab.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pakkitab.wordpress.com homepage info - get ready to check Pakkitab Word Press best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about pakkitab.wordpress.com

4 out of 5 dentists recommend this WordPress.com site

Visit pakkitab.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pakkitab.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pakkitab.wordpress.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,150 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pakkitab.wordpress.com

13 ms

pakkitab.wordpress.com

215 ms

120 ms

css

168 ms

141 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Pakkitab.wordpress.com, 17% (8 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 17% (8 requests) were made to S1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (421 ms) relates to the external source I2.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 434.5 kB (74%)

Content Size

583.9 kB

After Optimization

149.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Pakkitab.wordpress.com main page is 583.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 501.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 29.5 kB

  • Original 39.2 kB
  • After minification 37.8 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 372.8 kB

  • Original 501.0 kB
  • After minification 389.9 kB
  • After compression 128.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 372.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 32.1 kB

  • Original 43.7 kB
  • After minification 41.2 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pakkitab.wordpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (69%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pakkitab Word Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pakkitab.wordpress.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

pakkitab.wordpress.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

pakkitab.wordpress.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pakkitab.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pakkitab.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pakkitab Word Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: