3.9 sec in total
20 ms
1.8 sec
2.1 sec
Visit rydakul.wordpress.com now to see the best up-to-date Rydakul Word Press content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rydakul.wordpress.com
This WordPress.com site is the bee's knees
Visit rydakul.wordpress.comWe analyzed Rydakul.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 20 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rydakul.wordpress.com performance score
20 ms
298 ms
136 ms
194 ms
161 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Rydakul.wordpress.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 13% (7 requests) were made to S2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (802 ms) relates to the external source I2.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 803.8 kB (47%)
1.7 MB
889.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Rydakul.wordpress.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 703.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rydakul Word Press images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 505.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 505.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 256.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rydakul.wordpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 256.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (61%)
44
17
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rydakul Word Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rydakul.wordpress.com
20 ms
rydakul.wordpress.com
298 ms
136 ms
css
194 ms
style.css
161 ms
171 ms
173 ms
style.css
159 ms
gprofiles.js
386 ms
wpgroho.js
167 ms
169 ms
jetpack-carousel.css
176 ms
tiled-gallery.css
167 ms
185 ms
widgets.js
190 ms
174 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
382 ms
w.js
189 ms
merriweather.css
68 ms
PfH3bDPNGHw
423 ms
7871622728_6982243d73_z.jpg
680 ms
ZASexlSHCEU
612 ms
XVPxPZT8Toc
598 ms
7413370642_349105b66a_z.jpg
652 ms
agQSCstkTsc
594 ms
7399771998_6f693e425f_z.jpg
691 ms
htstxeVj2xU
592 ms
bEIJ8XWG4gE
593 ms
iHF35X4yWF0
589 ms
7392503810_1f056fd19c_z.jpg
802 ms
7486261784_1ec69064fb_z.jpg
650 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzI3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
511 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
626 ms
Noticons.svg
290 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
123 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
293 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
390 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
389 ms
px.gif
412 ms
409 ms
hovercard.css
302 ms
services.css
400 ms
px.gif
430 ms
g.gif
324 ms
g.gif
327 ms
g.gif
424 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
502 ms
www-embed-player.js
593 ms
link
425 ms
track.php
439 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
135 ms
ad_status.js
143 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
10 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
13 ms
rydakul.wordpress.com SEO score
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rydakul.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rydakul.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rydakul.wordpress.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rydakul Word Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: