Tools & Wizards About Us
socket.webmail.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

socket.webmail.net

Page Load Speed

926 ms in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

575 ms

Page Rendered

315 ms

socket.webmail.net screenshot

About Website

Visit socket.webmail.net now to see the best up-to-date Socket Webmail content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about socket.webmail.net

Visit socket.webmail.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Socket.webmail.net page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 890 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

socket.webmail.net performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.07

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

socket.webmail.net

36 ms

www.webmail.net

30 ms

caf.js

130 ms

2.5940ae1c.chunk.js

172 ms

main.4e219663.chunk.js

170 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Socket.webmail.net, 40% (2 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 20% (1 request) were made to Webmail.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (172 ms) relates to the external source Img1.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 kB (3%)

Content Size

55.0 kB

After Optimization

53.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Socket.webmail.net main page is 55.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 52.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.6 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 52% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 123 B

  • Original 52.5 kB
  • After minification 52.5 kB
  • After compression 52.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Socket Webmail. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

socket.webmail.net

socket.webmail.net

36 ms

www.webmail.net

www.webmail.net

30 ms

caf.js

caf.js

130 ms

2.5940ae1c.chunk.js

2.5940ae1c.chunk.js

172 ms

main.4e219663.chunk.js

main.4e219663.chunk.js

170 ms

Accessibility Review

socket.webmail.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

socket.webmail.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

socket.webmail.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Socket.webmail.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Socket.webmail.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

socket.webmail.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Socket Webmail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: