3.7 sec in total
208 ms
3.3 sec
123 ms
Click here to check amazing Validator WHATWG content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about validator.whatwg.org
Visit validator.whatwg.orgWe analyzed Validator.whatwg.org page load time and found that the first response time was 208 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
validator.whatwg.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value1.9 s
98/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.9 s
99/100
10%
208 ms
1922 ms
1156 ms
1216 ms
Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Validator.whatwg.org, 50% (2 requests) were made to Images.whatwg.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Validator.whatwg.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 kB (41%)
4.0 kB
2.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Validator.whatwg.org main page is 4.0 kB. This result falls within a big category (top 100 000) of medium weight web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 805 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 805 B or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 835 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Validator WHATWG needs image optimization as it can save up to 835 B or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
We found no issues to fix!
2
2
The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Validator WHATWG. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
validator.whatwg.org
208 ms
validator.whatwg.org
1922 ms
logo
1156 ms
logo.svg
1216 ms
validator.whatwg.org accessibility score
validator.whatwg.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
validator.whatwg.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Validator.whatwg.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Validator.whatwg.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
validator.whatwg.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Validator WHATWG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: