3.1 sec in total
845 ms
1.9 sec
385 ms
Visit video.wapgrab.com now to see the best up-to-date Video Wapgrab content for Indonesia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about video.wapgrab.com
Visit video.wapgrab.comWe analyzed Video.wapgrab.com page load time and found that the first response time was 845 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
video.wapgrab.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
8/100
10%
Value5.6 s
18/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value5.9 s
66/100
10%
845 ms
5 ms
6 ms
83 ms
137 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Video.wapgrab.com, 42% (28 requests) were made to I.ytimg.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (845 ms) belongs to the original domain Video.wapgrab.com.
Page size can be reduced by 77.4 kB (14%)
563.2 kB
485.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Video.wapgrab.com main page is 563.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 432.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Video Wapgrab images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 293 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 28.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Video.wapgrab.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (17%)
65
54
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Video Wapgrab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
video.wapgrab.com
845 ms
style.css
5 ms
font-awesome.min.css
6 ms
jquery-1.10.2.js
83 ms
jquery-ui.js
137 ms
jquery.form.min.js
175 ms
complate.js
135 ms
adsbygoogle.js
169 ms
all.js
364 ms
mqdefault.jpg
310 ms
batik.png
287 ms
videoza_logo.png
139 ms
music-2-48.png
268 ms
video.png
139 ms
screenshot-48.png
141 ms
chart.png
210 ms
fb.png
209 ms
twitter.png
266 ms
gplus.png
269 ms
digg.png
268 ms
reddit.png
285 ms
linkedin.png
286 ms
mqdefault.jpg
337 ms
mqdefault.jpg
336 ms
mqdefault.jpg
409 ms
mqdefault.jpg
409 ms
mqdefault.jpg
409 ms
mqdefault.jpg
555 ms
mqdefault.jpg
556 ms
mqdefault.jpg
554 ms
mqdefault.jpg
616 ms
mqdefault.jpg
618 ms
mqdefault.jpg
616 ms
mqdefault.jpg
616 ms
mqdefault.jpg
615 ms
mqdefault.jpg
615 ms
mqdefault.jpg
631 ms
mqdefault.jpg
630 ms
mqdefault.jpg
617 ms
mqdefault.jpg
631 ms
mqdefault.jpg
630 ms
mqdefault.jpg
627 ms
mqdefault.jpg
629 ms
mqdefault.jpg
629 ms
mqdefault.jpg
628 ms
mqdefault.jpg
653 ms
mqdefault.jpg
620 ms
mqdefault.jpg
643 ms
mqdefault.jpg
638 ms
js15.js
206 ms
ca-pub-2830424020985291.js
382 ms
zrt_lookup.html
361 ms
show_ads_impl.js
151 ms
ads
327 ms
205 ms
osd.js
56 ms
xd_arbiter.php
114 ms
xd_arbiter.php
157 ms
0.php
63 ms
ping
200 ms
m_js_controller.js
55 ms
abg.js
69 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
46 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
38 ms
s
20 ms
x_button_blue2.png
17 ms
video.wapgrab.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
video.wapgrab.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
video.wapgrab.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8;
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Video.wapgrab.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Video.wapgrab.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8;. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
video.wapgrab.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Video Wapgrab. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: