Tools & Wizards About Us
w3cshare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 92

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

w3cshare.com

沐鸣|沐鸣平台代理-开户官网

Page Load Speed

31 sec in total

First Response

15.2 sec

Resources Loaded

15.6 sec

Page Rendered

214 ms

w3cshare.com screenshot

About Website

Visit w3cshare.com now to see the best up-to-date W 3 Cshare content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about w3cshare.com

沐鸣注册主管【Q29052642】官网免费提供代理最高扶持待遇W3Cshare前端分享-分享的不仅仅是前端!Web前端开发技术分享,专注前端开发,关注用户体验,关注国内外最新最好的前端开发技术和前端开发资讯的专业博客!

Visit w3cshare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed W3cshare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 15.2 sec and then it took 15.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

w3cshare.com performance score

92

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.156

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

w3cshare.com

15197 ms

caf.js

49 ms

parking_caf_281_1409192.js

87 ms

bd_bg.gif

80 ms

search_language_2.jpg

160 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original W3cshare.com, 22% (2 requests) were made to Dp.g.doubleclick.net and 11% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (15.2 sec) belongs to the original domain W3cshare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 61.1 kB (77%)

Content Size

79.2 kB

After Optimization

18.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of W3cshare.com main page is 79.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 69.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 61.1 kB

  • Original 69.0 kB
  • After minification 69.0 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.1 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 10.3 kB
  • After minification 10.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. W 3 Cshare images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of W 3 Cshare. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

w3cshare.com

w3cshare.com

15197 ms

caf.js

caf.js

49 ms

parking_caf_281_1409192.js

parking_caf_281_1409192.js

87 ms

bd_bg.gif

bd_bg.gif

80 ms

search_language_2.jpg

search_language_2.jpg

160 ms

caf.gif

caf.gif

41 ms

slave.html

slave.html

30 ms

domainpark.cgi

domainpark.cgi

31 ms

tracking.php

tracking.php

89 ms

Accessibility Review

w3cshare.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

w3cshare.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

w3cshare.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise W3cshare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that W3cshare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

w3cshare.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of W 3 Cshare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: