2.9 sec in total
94 ms
2 sec
760 ms
Click here to check amazing Watermarke Church content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about watermarkechurch.org
Welcome to Watermarke Church We want to see our community transformed by a relationship with Jesus Christ. We believe that can happen by Finding Jesus, Knowing Jesus, and Showing Jesus. Everything w...
Visit watermarkechurch.orgWe analyzed Watermarkechurch.org page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
watermarkechurch.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.6 s
0/100
10%
Value18.1 s
0/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value770 ms
38/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.7 s
4/100
10%
94 ms
229 ms
59 ms
90 ms
95 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Watermarkechurch.org, 2% (2 requests) were made to Api.reftagger.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (407 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 812.0 kB (23%)
3.6 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Watermarkechurch.org main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 112.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 679.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Watermarke Church needs image optimization as it can save up to 679.6 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Watermarkechurch.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 75 (86%)
87
12
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Watermarke Church. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 40 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
watermarkechurch.org
94 ms
www.watermarkechurch.org
229 ms
fontello.css
59 ms
select2.min.css
90 ms
iconfonts.css
95 ms
frontend.min.css
163 ms
tooltip.css
92 ms
tooltipster-sideTip-shadow.min.css
98 ms
featherlight.css
93 ms
lity.min.css
121 ms
mec-general-calendar.css
121 ms
style.css
125 ms
style.css
124 ms
ctf-styles.min.css
125 ms
style.css
151 ms
magnific-popup.css
153 ms
flexslider.css
155 ms
owl.carousel.css
155 ms
owl.theme.default.css
157 ms
style.min.css
197 ms
theme.min.css
196 ms
header-footer.min.css
199 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
199 ms
frontend.min.css
218 ms
swiper.min.css
202 ms
post-55.css
210 ms
frontend.min.css
256 ms
post-65.css
212 ms
bootstrap.css
248 ms
dashicons.min.css
225 ms
frontend.css
239 ms
icon_font.css
242 ms
post-79.css
254 ms
post-204.css
267 ms
general.min.css
270 ms
MEC-fixes.css
271 ms
css
25 ms
fontawesome.min.css
280 ms
solid.min.css
259 ms
brands.min.css
228 ms
footerLogo.css
212 ms
animations.min.css
215 ms
jquery.min.js
244 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
218 ms
mec-general-calendar.js
263 ms
tooltip.js
200 ms
frontend.js
204 ms
events.js
212 ms
tracker.js
225 ms
js.cookie.js
226 ms
publicShortcode.js
215 ms
bootstrap.min.js
214 ms
core.min.js
296 ms
datepicker.min.js
297 ms
jquery.typewatch.js
297 ms
featherlight.js
259 ms
select2.full.min.js
257 ms
lity.min.js
256 ms
colorbrightness.min.js
253 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
270 ms
general.min.js
270 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
261 ms
underscore.min.js
259 ms
footerLogo.js
249 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
245 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
261 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
260 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
235 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
234 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
234 ms
hooks.min.js
233 ms
i18n.min.js
265 ms
frontend.min.js
262 ms
waypoints.min.js
256 ms
frontend.min.js
254 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
239 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
239 ms
web-logo.png
262 ms
wm.jpg
320 ms
georgia-de-lotz-CiSizRTO8U8-unsplash-scaled.jpg
259 ms
2014-Horizontal-Watermarke-Church-Logo-2-WHITE.png
168 ms
reftagger.js
322 ms
font
36 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
180 ms
font
49 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
170 ms
sf-logo16-white.png
125 ms
embed
407 ms
sf-logo16-black.png
73 ms
log
55 ms
js
42 ms
watermarkechurch.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
watermarkechurch.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
watermarkechurch.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Watermarkechurch.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Watermarkechurch.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
watermarkechurch.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Watermarke Church. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: