Tools & Wizards About Us
waterservercompare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

waterservercompare.com

ウォーターサーバー総合比較！

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

782 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

453 ms

waterservercompare.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Waterservercompare content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about waterservercompare.com

ウォーターサーバーを徹底比較した総合サイト！ このサイトでお水のこと・サーバーのことが分かります！ 実際にウォーターサーバーを使っている私が、どんな風に商品を選んだのか、これから設置しようとしている人にお手伝いをするサイトです。

Visit waterservercompare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Waterservercompare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 782 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

waterservercompare.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

waterservercompare.com

782 ms

styles.css

316 ms

adsbygoogle.js

7 ms

tables.css

196 ms

commonstyles.css

204 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Waterservercompare.com, 13% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 13% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Waterservercompare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 94.5 kB (20%)

Content Size

469.4 kB

After Optimization

374.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Waterservercompare.com main page is 469.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 279.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 20.5 kB
  • After minification 20.3 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 279.1 kB
  • After minification 272.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Waterservercompare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 41.8 kB

  • Original 131.4 kB
  • After minification 131.2 kB
  • After compression 89.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.8 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 31.7 kB

  • Original 38.4 kB
  • After minification 31.7 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Waterservercompare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (43%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Waterservercompare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

waterservercompare.com

waterservercompare.com

782 ms

styles.css

styles.css

316 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

7 ms

tables.css

tables.css

196 ms

commonstyles.css

commonstyles.css

204 ms

ca-pub-9446798647271068.js

ca-pub-9446798647271068.js

153 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

165 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

75 ms

box_top.png

box_top.png

228 ms

h1.jpg

h1.jpg

211 ms

box_body.png

box_body.png

341 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

836 ms

h3.jpg

h3.jpg

345 ms

h3_r.jpg

h3_r.jpg

344 ms

h5.jpg

h5.jpg

390 ms

li.gif

li.gif

414 ms

photo%20(2).jpg

photo%20(2).jpg

1028 ms

ads

ads

266 ms

menu_h4.jpg

menu_h4.jpg

411 ms

menu_bottom.jpg

menu_bottom.jpg

413 ms

menu_body.jpg

menu_body.jpg

412 ms

menu_bg.gif

menu_bg.gif

447 ms

menu_l2.gif

menu_l2.gif

580 ms

box_bottom.png

box_bottom.png

569 ms

topmenu.jpg

topmenu.jpg

587 ms

menu_item.jpg

menu_item.jpg

632 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

22 ms

osd.js

osd.js

20 ms

ads

ads

230 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

777505227838633181

777505227838633181

36 ms

abg.js

abg.js

37 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

53 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

95 ms

14515208046486369028

14515208046486369028

28 ms

s

s

51 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

53 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

3 ms

SEO Factors

waterservercompare.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    SHIFT_JIS

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Waterservercompare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Waterservercompare.com main page’s claimed encoding is shift_jis. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

waterservercompare.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Waterservercompare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: