4 sec in total
217 ms
3.3 sec
499 ms
Visit we-technologies.com now to see the best up-to-date We Technologies content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about we-technologies.com
Water Engineering Technologies has developed an innovative wastewater treatment technology for Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) for global communities.
Visit we-technologies.comWe analyzed We-technologies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 217 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
we-technologies.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value2,210 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value18.0 s
3/100
10%
217 ms
742 ms
233 ms
66 ms
124 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original We-technologies.com, 17% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.
Page size can be reduced by 90.0 kB (7%)
1.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of We-technologies.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 846.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. We Technologies images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 63.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.6 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. We-technologies.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (60%)
62
25
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of We Technologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
we-technologies.com
217 ms
www.we-technologies.com
742 ms
css
233 ms
slicknav.css
66 ms
layout.css
124 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
125 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
126 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
126 ms
jquery.min.js
56 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
16 ms
modernizr.min.js
27 ms
js
1015 ms
index.css
126 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
126 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
184 ms
jquery.slicknav.js
184 ms
doubletaptogo.js
183 ms
jquery.min.js
81 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
186 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
184 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
185 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
306 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
306 ms
analytics.js
387 ms
XlEED1g2--I
254 ms
logo.png
121 ms
logo2.png
121 ms
phone.png
120 ms
bg1.jpg
717 ms
bg2.jpg
334 ms
epa.jpg
121 ms
mgg.jpg
255 ms
mhor.jpg
252 ms
footerlogo.png
182 ms
artonic.png
180 ms
hbox6img1-1.png
212 ms
hbox6img1-2.png
212 ms
hbox6img1-3.png
279 ms
hbox6img2-1.png
281 ms
hbox6img2-2.png
280 ms
hbox6img4-1.png
281 ms
hbox6img4-2.png
540 ms
hbox6img5-1.png
541 ms
hbox6img5-2.png
540 ms
z7NOdRfiaC4Vd8hhoPzfb5vBTP2D6pumR_0.ttf
132 ms
z7NOdRfiaC4Vd8hhoPzfb5vBTP1v7ZumR_0.ttf
178 ms
z7NOdRfiaC4Vd8hhoPzfb5vBTP1d7ZumR_0.ttf
210 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
183 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
183 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
205 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
204 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
210 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
229 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
230 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
231 ms
footerbg.jpg
524 ms
footer2bg.png
653 ms
backtotop.png
598 ms
bx_loader.gif
599 ms
slideright.png
598 ms
slideleft.png
600 ms
www-player.css
61 ms
www-embed-player.js
92 ms
base.js
132 ms
ad_status.js
327 ms
collect
546 ms
Hg8RJ6IYDEt2XfeS9TTatHSj5NgA1bkUUg8jx44YVvw.js
369 ms
embed.js
41 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
137 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
160 ms
js
676 ms
collect
537 ms
analytics.js
667 ms
id
167 ms
Create
249 ms
js
903 ms
GenerateIT
147 ms
we-technologies.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
we-technologies.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
we-technologies.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise We-technologies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that We-technologies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
we-technologies.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of We Technologies. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: