Tools & Wizards About Us
wearepapertiger.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

wearepapertiger.com

Interactive Design Agency | Paper Tiger

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

834 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

141 ms

wearepapertiger.com screenshot

About Website

Visit wearepapertiger.com now to see the best up-to-date Weare Paper Tiger content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wearepapertiger.com

Paper Tiger is an interactive design agency building ambitious websites for badass brands.

Visit wearepapertiger.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wearepapertiger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 834 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wearepapertiger.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.5 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wearepapertiger.com

834 ms

papertiger.com

177 ms

bootstrap.min.css

41 ms

bootstrap-glyphicons.css

30 ms

bigvideo.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wearepapertiger.com, 57% (36 requests) were made to Papertiger.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Applesocial.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.luckyorange.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 941.1 kB (77%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

288.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wearepapertiger.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 949.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 16.5 kB

  • Original 21.6 kB
  • After minification 19.3 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 23.3 kB
  • After minification 6.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Weare Paper Tiger needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 74% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 707.8 kB

  • Original 949.7 kB
  • After minification 886.8 kB
  • After compression 241.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 707.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 199.6 kB

  • Original 234.8 kB
  • After minification 209.9 kB
  • After compression 35.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wearepapertiger.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 199.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (72%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weare Paper Tiger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wearepapertiger.com

wearepapertiger.com

834 ms

papertiger.com

papertiger.com

177 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

41 ms

bootstrap-glyphicons.css

bootstrap-glyphicons.css

30 ms

bigvideo.css

bigvideo.css

38 ms

icheck.css

icheck.css

36 ms

css

css

70 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

83 ms

styles.css

styles.css

69 ms

awwwards.css

awwwards.css

33 ms

sanfrancisco-font.css

sanfrancisco-font.css

34 ms

redesign.css

redesign.css

82 ms

modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js

88 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

142 ms

js

js

252 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

133 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

164 ms

video.js

video.js

129 ms

bigvideo.js

bigvideo.js

127 ms

retina.js

retina.js

134 ms

cssParser.js

cssParser.js

161 ms

css-filters-polyfill.js

css-filters-polyfill.js

133 ms

plugin.js

plugin.js

134 ms

main.js

main.js

131 ms

ga.js

ga.js

80 ms

hotjar-15891.js

hotjar-15891.js

227 ms

all.js

all.js

384 ms

logoNew.png

logoNew.png

53 ms

menu-arrow.png

menu-arrow.png

53 ms

mobile-menu.png

mobile-menu.png

56 ms

arrow-white.png

arrow-white.png

55 ms

arrow-red.png

arrow-red.png

56 ms

mobile-logo.png

mobile-logo.png

55 ms

mobile-close.png

mobile-close.png

56 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

99 ms

sanfranciscodisplay-regular-webfont.woff

sanfranciscodisplay-regular-webfont.woff

574 ms

sanfranciscodisplay-medium-webfont.woff

sanfranciscodisplay-medium-webfont.woff

579 ms

sanfranciscodisplay-thin-webfont.woff

sanfranciscodisplay-thin-webfont.woff

669 ms

sanfranciscodisplay-ultralight-webfont.woff

sanfranciscodisplay-ultralight-webfont.woff

686 ms

sanfranciscodisplay-semibold-webfont.woff

sanfranciscodisplay-semibold-webfont.woff

760 ms

sanfranciscodisplay-bold-webfont.woff

sanfranciscodisplay-bold-webfont.woff

783 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

39 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

145 ms

397240.js

397240.js

201 ms

w.js

w.js

155 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

136 ms

bootstrap-glyphicons.css

bootstrap-glyphicons.css

120 ms

bigvideo.css

bigvideo.css

122 ms

icheck.css

icheck.css

120 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

118 ms

styles.css

styles.css

122 ms

awwwards.css

awwwards.css

117 ms

sanfrancisco-font.css

sanfrancisco-font.css

112 ms

redesign.css

redesign.css

111 ms

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

126 ms

css-filters-polyfill-parser.js

css-filters-polyfill-parser.js

44 ms

194 ms

clickstream.min.js

clickstream.min.js

1041 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

296 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

526 ms

cssParser.js

cssParser.js

27 ms

form.js

form.js

210 ms

visit-data

visit-data

297 ms

Accessibility Review

wearepapertiger.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wearepapertiger.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wearepapertiger.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wearepapertiger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wearepapertiger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wearepapertiger.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Weare Paper Tiger. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: