1.2 sec in total
104 ms
1 sec
119 ms
Click here to check amazing Weare Stylecamp content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wearestylecamp.com
Simple, timeless and elegant modern vintage clothing for women, handmade by Stylecamp, UK. Find colourful women's dresses, sets and separates inspired by 1930s, 1940s and 1950s vintage Golden Hollywoo...
Visit wearestylecamp.comWe analyzed Wearestylecamp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
wearestylecamp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value20.7 s
0/100
10%
Value25,480 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.667
8/100
15%
Value36.4 s
0/100
10%
104 ms
91 ms
135 ms
72 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Wearestylecamp.com, 75% (30 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 13% (5 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (670 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (77%)
2.8 MB
647.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Wearestylecamp.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wearestylecamp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (74%)
38
10
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weare Stylecamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wearestylecamp.com
104 ms
www.wearestylecamp.com
91 ms
bt
135 ms
require.min.js
72 ms
main-r.min.js
70 ms
viewer.css
98 ms
UpgradeBrowser.js
118 ms
dynamicmodel
34 ms
74c6f3_d1a6bbad7bf297da93bb5b5d5df3cf41_2025.json.z
660 ms
74c6f3_33d6e9f86168fa64e8b8b647b7f12ed1_2019.json.z
670 ms
ugc-viewer
233 ms
ugc-viewer
233 ms
bt
232 ms
skins.min.js
229 ms
components.min.js
167 ms
utils.min.js
35 ms
core.min.js
85 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
221 ms
lodash.min.js
84 ms
TweenMax.min.js
223 ms
layout.min.js
230 ms
tpa.min.js
229 ms
fonts.min.js
228 ms
animations.min.js
224 ms
swfobject.min.js
224 ms
mousetrap.min.js
224 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
231 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
231 ms
react-dom.min.js
229 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
226 ms
widgets.min.js
229 ms
experiment.js
224 ms
render.min.js
229 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
251 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
249 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
247 ms
zepto.min.js
241 ms
color.min.js
241 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
421 ms
bt
170 ms
wearestylecamp.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
wearestylecamp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
wearestylecamp.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wearestylecamp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wearestylecamp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wearestylecamp.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Weare Stylecamp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: