2.6 sec in total
285 ms
2.1 sec
248 ms
Click here to check amazing Wea Re Thought Fox content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wearethoughtfox.com
A design and development studio
Visit wearethoughtfox.comWe analyzed Wearethoughtfox.com page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
wearethoughtfox.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value3.2 s
73/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
285 ms
5 ms
808 ms
115 ms
198 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Wearethoughtfox.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (838 ms) belongs to the original domain Wearethoughtfox.com.
Page size can be reduced by 206.5 kB (30%)
686.2 kB
479.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Wearethoughtfox.com main page is 686.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 447.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wea Re Thought Fox images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 88.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 88.2 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wearethoughtfox.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (32%)
28
19
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wea Re Thought Fox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wearethoughtfox.com
285 ms
font-awesome.css
5 ms
fonts.css
808 ms
watf.css
115 ms
royalslider.css
198 ms
rs-default-inverted.css
199 ms
jquery.min.js
10 ms
main.min.js
201 ms
wp-embed.min.js
205 ms
jquery.royalslider.min.js
308 ms
E974CF5991067ECAA.css
112 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
99 ms
logo-with-person.png
217 ms
logo-small.png
187 ms
icc-teaser.jpg
434 ms
taqa-web-teaser.jpg
245 ms
ippf-teaser1.jpg
188 ms
deep-sea-amnesty-21-400x315.jpg
440 ms
ArtDubai-1-400x315.jpg
511 ms
bbc-connected-2-400x315.jpg
517 ms
Robert_Carroll_IMG_4737_square.jpg
643 ms
Una_Janicijevic_DSC_7198_square.jpg
535 ms
clint_mclean_MG_0397_square.jpg
687 ms
Klara_Profile_Knight_Helmut_0264_square.jpg
589 ms
arndalepostbox-1-600x407.jpg
838 ms
hepworth-leeds-600x371.jpg
741 ms
logo.png
648 ms
IceCreamHead.png
776 ms
ga.js
32 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
wearethoughtfox.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
wearethoughtfox.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
wearethoughtfox.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wearethoughtfox.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wearethoughtfox.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wearethoughtfox.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wea Re Thought Fox. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: