Tools & Wizards About Us
web-xr.studio screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 70% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

web-xr.studio

WEB-XR.studio | Interactive 3D on website with Blender

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

319 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

559 ms

web-xr.studio screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing WEB XR content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about web-xr.studio

With WEB-XR.studio, you can freely publish 3D works on your web. AR (Augmented Reality), VR (Virtual Reality), markerless AR. Web3D, which is essential for the modern web, can be freely realized. You ...

Visit web-xr.studio

Key Findings

We analyzed Web-xr.studio page load time and found that the first response time was 319 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

web-xr.studio performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,960 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

web-xr.studio

319 ms

web-xr.studio

955 ms

js

122 ms

css

100 ms

app.css

507 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Web-xr.studio, 17% (4 requests) were made to Posar-storage.s3.ap-northeast-1.wasabisys.com and 17% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Posar-storage.s3.ap-northeast-1.wasabisys.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 180.8 kB (26%)

Content Size

708.7 kB

After Optimization

527.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Web-xr.studio main page is 708.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 527.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 15.9 kB

  • Original 20.5 kB
  • After minification 15.1 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.3 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 46.6 kB

  • Original 527.3 kB
  • After minification 480.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WEB XR images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 63 B

  • Original 20.0 kB
  • After minification 20.0 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 118.1 kB

  • Original 140.9 kB
  • After minification 136.8 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Web-xr.studio needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 118.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (44%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WEB XR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

web-xr.studio

web-xr.studio

319 ms

web-xr.studio

web-xr.studio

955 ms

js

js

122 ms

css

css

100 ms

app.css

app.css

507 ms

styles.css

styles.css

533 ms

app.js

app.js

1419 ms

ak-common-compiled.js

ak-common-compiled.js

899 ms

screenfull.min.js

screenfull.min.js

526 ms

api

api

772 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

33 ms

js

js

67 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

collect

collect

178 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

120 ms

css

css

14 ms

1510.png

1510.png

1235 ms

985.png

985.png

1430 ms

1311.png

1311.png

1317 ms

1568.png

1568.png

1033 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

38 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

61 ms

-F62fjtqLzI2JPCgQBnw7HFYwQgM.otf

-F62fjtqLzI2JPCgQBnw7HFYwQgM.otf

106 ms

-F6pfjtqLzI2JPCgQBnw7HFQei0a1Xdj.otf

-F6pfjtqLzI2JPCgQBnw7HFQei0a1Xdj.otf

107 ms

Accessibility Review

web-xr.studio accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

web-xr.studio best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

web-xr.studio SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Web-xr.studio can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Web-xr.studio main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

web-xr.studio

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of WEB XR. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: