11.5 sec in total
3.5 sec
7.1 sec
931 ms
Click here to check amazing Webbriefcase content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webbriefcase.net
WordPress membership site creation made easy. Discover how you can start earning ongoing recurring revenue from your very own WordPress membership site.
Visit webbriefcase.netWe analyzed Webbriefcase.net page load time and found that the first response time was 3.5 sec and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
webbriefcase.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
14/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value1,030 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.245
51/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
3542 ms
237 ms
126 ms
196 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Webbriefcase.net, 19% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Webbriefcase.net.
Page size can be reduced by 110.1 kB (21%)
520.6 kB
410.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Webbriefcase.net main page is 520.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 390.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webbriefcase images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.6 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webbriefcase.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 132 B or 40% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (77%)
69
16
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webbriefcase. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.webbriefcase.net
3542 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
237 ms
jetpack-carousel.css
126 ms
tiled-gallery.css
196 ms
css
27 ms
style.css
204 ms
style.css
187 ms
www.webbriefcase.net
506 ms
tipsy.css
261 ms
wp-shortcode.css
313 ms
style.css
306 ms
magnific-popup.css
412 ms
font-awesome.min.css
414 ms
responsive.css
483 ms
style.min.css
483 ms
default.min.css
418 ms
jquery.js
537 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
597 ms
op-jquery-base-all.min.js
600 ms
form.js
553 ms
spin.js
648 ms
jquery.spin.js
626 ms
tiled-gallery.js
669 ms
customscript.js
695 ms
jquery.tipsy.js
736 ms
wp-shortcode.js
725 ms
css
26 ms
css
25 ms
css
23 ms
popup.min.js
858 ms
validation.min.js
859 ms
jetpack-carousel.js
847 ms
jquery.uniform.min.js
847 ms
custom.js
861 ms
idle-timer.min.js
906 ms
ouibounce.js
896 ms
custom.js
904 ms
wp-embed.min.js
922 ms
op-front-all.min.js
1026 ms
menus.min.js
976 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1167 ms
sticky.js
1071 ms
ajax.js
873 ms
analytics.js
21 ms
linkid.js
22 ms
collect
77 ms
collect
77 ms
fbevents.js
120 ms
table-mac-bkg.jpg
649 ms
logo1.png
591 ms
cover-RecurringRevenueReport-3D-242x300.png
585 ms
style-10.png
410 ms
177.png
593 ms
325.png
595 ms
140.png
590 ms
check-triangle1.png
665 ms
305-alt.png
799 ms
290-alt.png
800 ms
258-alt.png
801 ms
ramaishaya.jpg
730 ms
thumb_KellyPoelker.jpg
774 ms
thumb_SenkaRadonich.jpg
902 ms
thumb_amplifyfb-222x222.jpg
905 ms
thumb_fatblastingformula-222x222.jpg
1092 ms
thumb_getmoneyfit-222x222.jpg
967 ms
thumb_loveyourworkbootcamp-222x222.jpg
980 ms
thumb-membersSenkaRadonich-222x222.jpg
961 ms
thumb-membersRama-222x222.jpg
1076 ms
count.js
56 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
57 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
74 ms
boeCNmOCCh-EWFLSfVffDg.woff
109 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
110 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8xsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
108 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
109 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
108 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-kxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
106 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
109 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr24bNCNEoFTpS2BTjF6FB5E.woff
109 ms
7XUFZ5tgS-tD6QamInJTcdGU7DQ8I6RFMlK0vgclk7w.woff
109 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr0bathaSTBR2c4i13_wzlb0.woff
110 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
111 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
110 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
110 ms
HkF_qI1x_noxlxhrhMQYED8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
110 ms
oUan5VrEkpzIazlUe5ieaA.woff
122 ms
38 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
839 ms
webbriefcase.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
webbriefcase.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
webbriefcase.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webbriefcase.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webbriefcase.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webbriefcase.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webbriefcase. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: