1.5 sec in total
288 ms
1 sec
211 ms
Click here to check amazing Web Chilli content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webchilli.com
software development,website development,
Visit webchilli.comWe analyzed Webchilli.com page load time and found that the first response time was 288 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
webchilli.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value17.4 s
0/100
25%
Value12.0 s
4/100
10%
Value290 ms
80/100
30%
Value0.559
13/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
288 ms
78 ms
83 ms
142 ms
110 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Webchilli.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to S2.mylivechat.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Jigsaw.w3.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (507 ms) belongs to the original domain Webchilli.com.
Page size can be reduced by 314.8 kB (16%)
1.9 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Webchilli.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Chilli images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 188.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 188.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webchilli.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 61% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (36%)
42
27
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Chilli. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webchilli.com
288 ms
style.css
78 ms
style1.css
83 ms
jquery.js
142 ms
scripts.js
110 ms
slider.css
97 ms
jssor.js
169 ms
jssor.slider.js
161 ms
chatinline.aspx
237 ms
vcss
305 ms
main_bg.jpg
52 ms
logo.gif
85 ms
top.gif
58 ms
btn-off.gif
57 ms
divider.gif
59 ms
btn-on.gif
54 ms
left-menu.gif
94 ms
icon.gif
100 ms
loading.gif
109 ms
web.jpg
428 ms
web-2.jpg
301 ms
web-3.jpg
364 ms
web-4.jpg
255 ms
web-5.jpg
312 ms
block-bg.gif
158 ms
block-1.png
211 ms
more-icon.gif
257 ms
block-2.png
300 ms
block-3.png
366 ms
bottom.gif
365 ms
header-bg.png
364 ms
pic1.jpg
396 ms
pic2.jpg
419 ms
pic3.jpg
428 ms
pic4.jpg
442 ms
pic5.jpg
495 ms
pic6.jpg
479 ms
pic7.jpg
463 ms
slide-bg.png
478 ms
sub.png
473 ms
footer.gif
492 ms
silde-nav.png
507 ms
vcss-blue
162 ms
livechat2.aspx
174 ms
chatinline.css
35 ms
resources2.aspx
110 ms
livechatinit2.js
36 ms
sprite.png
36 ms
webchilli.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webchilli.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
webchilli.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webchilli.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webchilli.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webchilli.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Chilli. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: