Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

webcrew.co.jp

Cookie Error

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

560 ms

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

174 ms

webcrew.co.jp screenshot

About Website

Visit webcrew.co.jp now to see the best up-to-date Webcrew content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webcrew.co.jp

株式会社ウェブクルーは、比べて、選べて、“ズバッ”と決められるポータルサイト「ズバット」をはじめ、消費者の皆様に最適な商品・サービスをお選びいただける比較サイトを運営しています。

Visit webcrew.co.jp

Key Findings

We analyzed Webcrew.co.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 560 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webcrew.co.jp performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webcrew.co.jp

560 ms

www.webcrew.co.jp

714 ms

reset.css

316 ms

common.css

731 ms

top.css

403 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Webcrew.co.jp, 77% (40 requests) were made to Img.phoenix.webcrew.co.jp and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Img.phoenix.webcrew.co.jp.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 14.1 kB (2%)

Content Size

569.7 kB

After Optimization

555.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Webcrew.co.jp main page is 569.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 535.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 16.9 kB
  • After minification 16.1 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 535.6 kB
  • After minification 534.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webcrew images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (40%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webcrew. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

webcrew.co.jp accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webcrew.co.jp best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

webcrew.co.jp SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webcrew.co.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webcrew.co.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webcrew. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: