Tools & Wizards About Us
webgazerwork.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

webgazerwork.com

Webgazer Workflow Management Software

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

559 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

85 ms

webgazerwork.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to webgazerwork.com homepage info - get ready to check Webgazer Work best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about webgazerwork.com

Visit webgazerwork.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webgazerwork.com page load time and found that the first response time was 559 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webgazerwork.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

webgazerwork.com

559 ms

default.aspx

536 ms

Body1.css

530 ms

Body1.css

539 ms

WG3.gif

803 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Webgazerwork.com, 7% (1 request) were made to Seal.geotrust.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Webgazerwork.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 33.9 kB (80%)

Content Size

42.3 kB

After Optimization

8.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webgazerwork.com main page is 42.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 31.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 6.9 kB
  • After minification 5.8 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.2 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 810 B

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 858 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webgazer Work needs image optimization as it can save up to 810 B or 49% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 2.3 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB
  • After compression 1.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 26.8 kB

  • Original 31.3 kB
  • After minification 22.5 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webgazerwork.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webgazer Work. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

webgazerwork.com

webgazerwork.com

559 ms

default.aspx

default.aspx

536 ms

Body1.css

Body1.css

530 ms

Body1.css

Body1.css

539 ms

WG3.gif

WG3.gif

803 ms

orangebutterfly.gif

orangebutterfly.gif

559 ms

getgeotrustsslseal

getgeotrustsslseal

157 ms

go1.gif

go1.gif

308 ms

default.aspx

default.aspx

281 ms

top_panel2.gif

top_panel2.gif

1078 ms

top_panel.gif

top_panel.gif

1082 ms

mail_top_panel1.gif

mail_top_panel1.gif

299 ms

mail_top_panel1.gif

mail_top_panel1.gif

556 ms

BigBack.jpg

BigBack.jpg

562 ms

bigback.jpg

bigback.jpg

560 ms

SEO Factors

webgazerwork.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webgazerwork.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Webgazerwork.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

webgazerwork.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webgazer Work. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: