Access webhostingvergleich24.com. Webhosting Vergleich 2024 & aktuelle Hosting-Gutscheine

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.2

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

webhostingvergleich24.com

474 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

188 ms

style.css

216 ms

front.css

208 ms

style_front.css

213 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Webhostingvergleich24.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Webhostingvergleich24.com.

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Webhostingvergleich24.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 72.7 kB

Original 99.6 kB
After minification 99.5 kB
After compression 27.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 13.7 kB

Original 1.5 MB
After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webhosting Vergleich 24 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 164.4 kB

Original 255.1 kB
After minification 255.0 kB
After compression 90.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 164.4 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 202.5 kB

Original 243.8 kB
After minification 243.7 kB
After compression 41.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webhostingvergleich24.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webhosting Vergleich 24. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

DE
Language Claimed

DE
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webhostingvergleich24.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webhostingvergleich24.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webhostingvergleich24.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webhosting Vergleich 24. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Webhosting Vergleich 2024 & aktuelle Hosting-Gutscheine | HOSTERZ

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

webhostingvergleich24.com

wp-emoji-release.min.js

style.css

front.css

style_front.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

webhostingvergleich24.com

wp-emoji-release.min.js

style.css

front.css

style_front.css

bootstrap.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

style.css

jquery.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

q2w3-fixed-widget.min.js

front.js

jquery.tablesorter.min.js

content-shortcodes.css

front.min.js

core.min.js

widget.min.js

mouse.min.js

sortable.min.js

other-shortcodes.js

css

2nybD5oaLh4

Webhosting-Vergleich.png

Mittwald-Test.png

bg_button.png

Alfahosting-Test.png

webgo-screenshot.png

ALL-INKL-Test.png

Webspace-Verkauf-Screenshot.png

ONE-com-Test.png

webhoster.de-Webhosting-Anbieter.jpg

Greatnet-Webhosting-Anbieter-im-Test.png

domainFACTORY.jpg

Hetzner-Online-AG.png

ESTUGO.png

Host-Europe-Webhosting.jpg

Febas-Startseite.jpg

goneo.png

1blu-homepage.png

1und11.png

Shared-Hosting.png

Virtual-Private-Server-VPS.png

Dedicated-Server-Hosting.png