Tools & Wizards About Us
webmailing.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

webmailing.net

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

272 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

284 ms

webmailing.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Webmailing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webmailing.net

Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.

Visit webmailing.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Webmailing.net page load time and found that the first response time was 272 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webmailing.net performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webmailing.net

272 ms

monetate.js

222 ms

application.css

74 ms

ng-modal.css

32 ms

angular.min.js

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 115 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Webmailing.net, 10% (12 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (346 ms) relates to the external source Static.hotjar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 667.4 kB (68%)

Content Size

983.7 kB

After Optimization

316.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webmailing.net main page is 983.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 754.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 29.6 kB

  • Original 39.1 kB
  • After minification 37.9 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 30.3 kB
  • After minification 26.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webmailing needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 504.0 kB

  • Original 754.6 kB
  • After minification 726.6 kB
  • After compression 250.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 504.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 130.3 kB

  • Original 159.7 kB
  • After minification 158.2 kB
  • After compression 29.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmailing.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (73%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webmailing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webmailing.net

webmailing.net

272 ms

monetate.js

monetate.js

222 ms

application.css

application.css

74 ms

ng-modal.css

ng-modal.css

32 ms

angular.min.js

angular.min.js

73 ms

ng-modal.js

ng-modal.js

56 ms

google_analytics.js

google_analytics.js

55 ms

google_oauth.js

google_oauth.js

54 ms

bold_chat.js

bold_chat.js

55 ms

eloqua.js

eloqua.js

63 ms

hotjar.js

hotjar.js

63 ms

adroll.js

adroll.js

63 ms

impactRadius.js

impactRadius.js

61 ms

in.js

in.js

81 ms

api.js

api.js

87 ms

api:client.js

api:client.js

101 ms

app.js

app.js

67 ms

cookies.js

cookies.js

67 ms

socialMedia.js

socialMedia.js

65 ms

countryDropdown.js

countryDropdown.js

63 ms

monetate.js

monetate.js

68 ms

index.js

index.js

70 ms

lander.js

lander.js

70 ms

seoPages.js

seoPages.js

67 ms

sitePages.js

sitePages.js

66 ms

search.js

search.js

65 ms

modal.js

modal.js

81 ms

forms.js

forms.js

76 ms

tldSelector.js

tldSelector.js

73 ms

setFixedTop.js

setFixedTop.js

73 ms

searchBar.js

searchBar.js

72 ms

currency.js

currency.js

71 ms

trust.js

trust.js

74 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

58 ms

tdfs-inner.css

tdfs-inner.css

71 ms

tdfs-temp.css

tdfs-temp.css

70 ms

thankyou.css

thankyou.css

70 ms

entry.js

entry.js

6 ms

css

css

24 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

14 ms

bd-icons.min.css

bd-icons.min.css

14 ms

ga.js

ga.js

34 ms

foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js

foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js

29 ms

userspace

userspace

146 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

138 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

323 ms

all.js

all.js

125 ms

314 ms

logo-header-2x.png

logo-header-2x.png

118 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

249 ms

332 ms

hotjar-10205.js

hotjar-10205.js

346 ms

elqCfg.min.js

elqCfg.min.js

208 ms

bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg

bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg

194 ms

bg-select.png

bg-select.png

193 ms

bg-target-bd-icon.png

bg-target-bd-icon.png

194 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

144 ms

foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js

foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js

120 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

200 ms

framework

framework

50 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

49 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

153 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

47 ms

270 ms

119 ms

collect

collect

190 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

116 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

174 ms

svrGP

svrGP

226 ms

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

100 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

93 ms

iframe

iframe

40 ms

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

56 ms

1233565733-idpiframe.js

1233565733-idpiframe.js

24 ms

svrGP.aspx

svrGP.aspx

71 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

52 ms

svrGP.aspx

svrGP.aspx

53 ms

iframerpc

iframerpc

27 ms

vms.js

vms.js

84 ms

fallback

fallback

35 ms

roundtrip.js

roundtrip.js

9 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

5 ms

payload

payload

33 ms

css

css

76 ms

542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js

542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js

109 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

17 ms

bc.pv

bc.pv

212 ms

visit-data

visit-data

207 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

5 ms

refresh.png

refresh.png

3 ms

audio.png

audio.png

6 ms

fbevents.hashing.js

fbevents.hashing.js

27 ms

out

out

26 ms

52 ms

19 ms

37 ms

out

out

19 ms

out

out

30 ms

out

out

34 ms

out

out

39 ms

out

out

43 ms

out

out

42 ms

out

out

38 ms

out

out

44 ms

37 ms

u.php

u.php

78 ms

96 ms

adsct

adsct

99 ms

30 ms

pixel

pixel

46 ms

sync

sync

20 ms

377928.gif

377928.gif

22 ms

tap.php

tap.php

9 ms

in

in

7 ms

sd

sd

73 ms

Accessibility Review

webmailing.net accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

webmailing.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

webmailing.net SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmailing.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Webmailing.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webmailing.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webmailing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: