Tools & Wizards About Us
webomatica.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

webomatica.com

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

184 ms

Resources Loaded

876 ms

Page Rendered

162 ms

webomatica.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to webomatica.com homepage info - get ready to check Webomatica best content right away, or after learning these important things about webomatica.com

Entertainment and Tech Digest

Visit webomatica.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webomatica.com page load time and found that the first response time was 184 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webomatica.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webomatica.com

184 ms

www.webomatica.com

184 ms

54 ms

style.css

186 ms

jetpack.css

276 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Webomatica.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (276 ms) belongs to the original domain Webomatica.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 86.2 kB (79%)

Content Size

109.1 kB

After Optimization

22.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webomatica.com main page is 109.1 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 64.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 11.0 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.4 kB or 67% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 26.4 kB

  • Original 33.7 kB
  • After minification 33.7 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 52.4 kB

  • Original 64.3 kB
  • After minification 63.8 kB
  • After compression 11.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webomatica.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webomatica. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

webomatica.com

webomatica.com

184 ms

www.webomatica.com

www.webomatica.com

184 ms

54 ms

style.css

style.css

186 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

276 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

147 ms

header_2013.gif

header_2013.gif

151 ms

socicons-rss.gif

socicons-rss.gif

153 ms

socicons-twitter.gif

socicons-twitter.gif

151 ms

Accessibility Review

webomatica.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Best Practices

webomatica.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

webomatica.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webomatica.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Webomatica.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webomatica.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webomatica. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: