Tools & Wizards About Us
websan.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

websan.net

Websan - Blog 2.0

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

299 ms

Resources Loaded

844 ms

Page Rendered

107 ms

websan.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to websan.net homepage info - get ready to check Websan best content right away, or after learning these important things about websan.net

Blog 2.0

Visit websan.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Websan.net page load time and found that the first response time was 299 ms and then it took 951 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

websan.net performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.4 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,780 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.506

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

websan.net

299 ms

style.css

52 ms

jquery.css

111 ms

jquery_003.js

146 ms

jquery.js

100 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Websan.net, 12% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 12% (2 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (299 ms) belongs to the original domain Websan.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 93.9 kB (59%)

Content Size

159.7 kB

After Optimization

65.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Websan.net main page is 159.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 116.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 20.8 kB
  • After minification 20.2 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 12.0 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Websan needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 42% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 65.0 kB

  • Original 116.7 kB
  • After minification 111.6 kB
  • After compression 51.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.0 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 10.2 kB
  • After minification 8.1 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websan.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (38%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Websan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

websan.net

websan.net

299 ms

style.css

style.css

52 ms

jquery.css

jquery.css

111 ms

jquery_003.js

jquery_003.js

146 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

100 ms

jquery_004.js

jquery_004.js

87 ms

jquery_002.js

jquery_002.js

85 ms

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.2.pack.js

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.2.pack.js

111 ms

all.js

all.js

10 ms

ga.js

ga.js

62 ms

logo-websan.jpg

logo-websan.jpg

108 ms

181 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

42 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

50 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

22 ms

like.php

like.php

153 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

20 ms

Accessibility Review

websan.net accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

websan.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

websan.net SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websan.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Websan.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

websan.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Websan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: