5.6 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.4 sec
818 ms
Visit websigma.in now to see the best up-to-date Web Sigma content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about websigma.in
IT services company with 8+ years of Industry experience. We have served clients across various industries
Visit websigma.inWe analyzed Websigma.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
websigma.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value7.3 s
4/100
25%
Value4.8 s
67/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.3 s
49/100
10%
1444 ms
68 ms
69 ms
70 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Websigma.in, 13% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Websigma.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (68%)
1.7 MB
543.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Websigma.in main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 610.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 252.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 252.7 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Sigma images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 353.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 353.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 527.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websigma.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 527.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (42%)
71
41
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Sigma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
websigma.in
1444 ms
ninja-forms-display.css
68 ms
qtip.css
69 ms
jquery.rating.css
70 ms
cache.skin.css
37 ms
main.css
70 ms
modules.css
73 ms
plugins.css
76 ms
main.css
109 ms
styles.css
127 ms
easy-social-share-buttons.css
92 ms
masterslider.main.css
88 ms
custom.css
118 ms
style.css
94 ms
social-share-icons.css
131 ms
style.css
99 ms
css
61 ms
jquery.js
153 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
126 ms
plugins.js
148 ms
main.js
135 ms
js
50 ms
main.js
200 ms
custom.modernizr.js
143 ms
css
41 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
242 ms
masterslider.min.js
244 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
344 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
246 ms
frontend.js
244 ms
scripts.min.js
242 ms
wp-embed.min.js
244 ms
essb-profiles.css
343 ms
websigma_logo.png
246 ms
preloader.gif
111 ms
seowp-dropdown-bg.png
111 ms
blank.gif
111 ms
seo_specialist_workplace-optimized.png
113 ms
ctkt-389x260.jpg
120 ms
ele-389x260.jpg
118 ms
ctkt_seo-150x150.png
111 ms
nb-150x150.png
112 ms
vitm-150x150.png
113 ms
jtt-150x150.png
114 ms
ba_seo-150x150.png
113 ms
bruges-150x150.png
116 ms
uttar-150x150.png
115 ms
ardley_ppc-150x150.png
115 ms
BLUE-150x150.png
114 ms
fs6_seo-150x150.png
116 ms
ele_seo-150x150.png
116 ms
dl-150x150.png
118 ms
services-socialmediamarketing-alt-colors-optimized.png
116 ms
services-seo-alt-colors-optimized.png
116 ms
services-analytics-alt-colors-optimized.png
119 ms
services-payperclick-alt-colors-optimized.png
118 ms
websigme_footer_logo-160x85.png
117 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
81 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
82 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
83 ms
Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
81 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
82 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
82 ms
iconfont.ttf
83 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
129 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
127 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
128 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
129 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
14 ms
essb-socicon-webfont.woff
83 ms
loading-2.gif
273 ms
slider-element-web-3.png
85 ms
slider-element-web-2.png
85 ms
slider-element-web-1.png
87 ms
falt-illustration-imac.png
85 ms
flat-illustration-macbook.png
86 ms
slider-element-graph.png
138 ms
flat-illustration-iphone.png
87 ms
flat-illustration-ipadmini.png
88 ms
flat-illustration-ipad.png
85 ms
slider-element-touch.png
89 ms
flat-illustration-hand-smaller.png
86 ms
mobile_apps.png
138 ms
app_store_icons.png
137 ms
light-skin-1.png
138 ms
websigma.in accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
websigma.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
websigma.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websigma.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Websigma.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
websigma.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Sigma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: