Tools & Wizards About Us
webtrafficflows.info screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

937 ms

webtrafficflows.info screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Webtrafficflows content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webtrafficflows.info

Visit webtrafficflows.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Webtrafficflows.info page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Webtrafficflows.info rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

webtrafficflows.info performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

webtrafficflows.info

1356 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

7 ms

styles.css

26 ms

style.css

23 ms

jquery.js

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Webtrafficflows.info and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Webtrafficflows.info.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 393.0 kB (67%)

Content Size

583.3 kB

After Optimization

190.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webtrafficflows.info main page is 583.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 220.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 42.9 kB

  • Original 61.2 kB
  • After minification 58.2 kB
  • After compression 18.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 92.9 kB
  • After minification 91.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webtrafficflows images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 152.7 kB

  • Original 209.0 kB
  • After minification 186.8 kB
  • After compression 56.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 152.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 196.0 kB

  • Original 220.2 kB
  • After minification 138.3 kB
  • After compression 24.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webtrafficflows.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 196.0 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (56%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webtrafficflows. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webtrafficflows.info

webtrafficflows.info

1356 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

7 ms

styles.css

styles.css

26 ms

style.css

style.css

23 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

25 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

24 ms

banner.png

banner.png

7 ms

main.js

main.js

13 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

11 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

6 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

12 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

3 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

2 ms

SEO Factors

webtrafficflows.info SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webtrafficflows.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webtrafficflows.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webtrafficflows.info

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webtrafficflows. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: