Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

webvamp.co.uk

Webvamp - Revamping the web through design

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

934 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

251 ms

webvamp.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Webvamp content for Qatar. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webvamp.co.uk

Revamping the web through a common sense approach to design, accessibility, information architecture (IA) & usability.

Visit webvamp.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Webvamp.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 934 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webvamp.co.uk performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webvamp.co.uk

934 ms

www.webvamp.co.uk

652 ms

screen.css

303 ms

code_highlighter.js

33 ms

ga.js

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Webvamp.co.uk, 13% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (934 ms) belongs to the original domain Webvamp.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 19.5 kB (35%)

Content Size

55.1 kB

After Optimization

35.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Webvamp.co.uk main page is 55.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 21.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 15.7 kB
  • After minification 15.7 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 10.0 kB
  • After minification 10.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webvamp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 21.8 kB
  • After minification 21.8 kB
  • After compression 19.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.8 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 7.6 kB
  • After minification 7.2 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webvamp.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webvamp. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

webvamp.co.uk accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

webvamp.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

webvamp.co.uk SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webvamp.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webvamp.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webvamp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: