5.8 sec in total
411 ms
4.6 sec
808 ms
Welcome to wecode.ma homepage info - get ready to check Wecode best content right away, or after learning these important things about wecode.ma
Creative storytelling, Fantastic design, Invisible technology. By combining these essential elements we build websites that focus on user experience, lead
Visit wecode.maWe analyzed Wecode.ma page load time and found that the first response time was 411 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
wecode.ma performance score
411 ms
79 ms
98 ms
162 ms
281 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Wecode.ma, 36% (37 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 13% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Wecode.ma.
Page size can be reduced by 891.3 kB (67%)
1.3 MB
442.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Wecode.ma main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 898.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.3 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 493 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wecode images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 564.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 564.1 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 252.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wecode.ma needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 252.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (46%)
87
47
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wecode. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wecode.ma
411 ms
css
79 ms
css
98 ms
style.css
162 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
281 ms
angular.min.js
365 ms
modernizr.custom.js
196 ms
classie.js
195 ms
jquery.countdown.js
234 ms
app.js
275 ms
controllers.js
276 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
315 ms
input-text.js
377 ms
notifyMe.js
338 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
338 ms
jquery.lettering.js
338 ms
jquery.textillate.js
376 ms
jquery.nicescroll.js
423 ms
modelclassie.js
422 ms
modalEffects.js
423 ms
js
58 ms
init.js
422 ms
logo-light.png
457 ms
plus-light.png
491 ms
minus-dark.png
522 ms
jquery.countdown.css
392 ms
animate.css
395 ms
owl.carousel.css
397 ms
component2.css
412 ms
font-awesome.min.css
486 ms
bootstrap.min.css
474 ms
inputtext.css
484 ms
modalcomponent.css
455 ms
pe-icon-7-stroke.css
456 ms
bg-dark.jpg
214 ms
bg_pattern.png
199 ms
aboutimg.jpg
971 ms
servcies-1.jpg
973 ms
servcies-2.jpg
973 ms
servcies-3.jpg
212 ms
servcies-4.jpg
971 ms
newsletterimg.jpg
972 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
509 ms
OsJ2DjdpjqFRVUSto6IffKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
606 ms
_aijTyevf54tkVDLy-dlnKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
758 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
849 ms
zO07Oxe3SOlw0l2YX2sdIS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
973 ms
57TQ-anwthzkETEIO4jESC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
841 ms
yQWaOD4iNU5NTY0apN-qjy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
840 ms
TDTjCH39JjVycIF24TlO-Q.ttf
840 ms
D2gN9uyZ9Ucx1fJ1Fhb7sy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
964 ms
Pe-icon-7-stroke.woff
745 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1084 ms
common.js
472 ms
map.js
597 ms
util.js
628 ms
marker.js
627 ms
infowindow.js
423 ms
onion.js
98 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
199 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
141 ms
stats.js
63 ms
controls.js
80 ms
transparent.png
335 ms
css
261 ms
vt
415 ms
vt
412 ms
vt
442 ms
vt
440 ms
vt
441 ms
vt
443 ms
vt
527 ms
vt
442 ms
vt
458 ms
vt
458 ms
vt
457 ms
vt
546 ms
vt
546 ms
vt
547 ms
vt
547 ms
vt
547 ms
vt
547 ms
vt
618 ms
vt
547 ms
vt
618 ms
vt
617 ms
vt
613 ms
vt
613 ms
vt
571 ms
vt
573 ms
pin-dark.png
266 ms
google_white5.png
151 ms
mapcnt6.png
221 ms
sv9.png
221 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
72 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
73 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
73 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
72 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
319 ms
tmapctrl.png
50 ms
cb_scout5.png
63 ms
tmapctrl4.png
62 ms
vt
142 ms
wecode.ma SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wecode.ma can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wecode.ma main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wecode.ma
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wecode. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: