7.8 sec in total
1.1 sec
5.6 sec
1.1 sec
Visit weftyandmash.com now to see the best up-to-date Weftyandmash content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about weftyandmash.com
A weblog on emerging technology and internet news, reviews, tips for a broad range of computing technologies.
Visit weftyandmash.comWe analyzed Weftyandmash.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
weftyandmash.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value3.5 s
64/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value3.6 s
91/100
10%
1134 ms
139 ms
163 ms
158 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 124 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Weftyandmash.com, 12% (15 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 7% (9 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source I2.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 528.4 kB (57%)
924.9 kB
396.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Weftyandmash.com main page is 924.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 433.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 82.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weftyandmash images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 239.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 239.2 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 207.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weftyandmash.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 207.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 82 (72%)
114
32
The browser has sent 114 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weftyandmash. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.weftyandmash.com
1134 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
139 ms
twentyfourteen.css
163 ms
layout.css
158 ms
style.css
160 ms
dashicons.min.css
211 ms
desktop_style.css
160 ms
intelliwidget.css
192 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
217 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
218 ms
css
149 ms
genericons.css
220 ms
style.css
219 ms
twentyfourteen.css
247 ms
jetpack.css
268 ms
jquery.js
333 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
279 ms
front_end_script.js
278 ms
tiled-gallery.js
279 ms
spin.js
307 ms
jquery.spin.js
324 ms
adsbygoogle.js
89 ms
infinity.js
253 ms
jquery.cycle.js
312 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js
269 ms
photon.js
279 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
35 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
300 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
304 ms
gprofiles.js
83 ms
wpgroho.js
312 ms
functions.js
328 ms
wp-embed.min.js
334 ms
modal.js
358 ms
postmessage.js
363 ms
jquery.jetpack-resize.js
371 ms
jquery.inview.js
371 ms
queuehandler.js
388 ms
sharing.js
393 ms
e-201611.js
31 ms
style.css
290 ms
DSC_0467.jpg
85 ms
DSC_0176.jpg
2600 ms
DSC_0207.jpg
68 ms
DSC_0240.jpg
62 ms
DSC_0224.jpg
68 ms
DSC_0256.jpg
60 ms
DSC_0025.jpg
58 ms
pattern-light.svg
81 ms
loading.gif
72 ms
DSC_0005-2.jpg
58 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
63 ms
BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf
140 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
303 ms
5pEc4QKTMA2oB4Hi9NkS4w.ttf
302 ms
Genericons.svg
1178 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
14 ms
LgcV55siz7BRNdbO3Huj5g.ttf
300 ms
XNVd6tsqi9wmKNvnh5HNEKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
360 ms
AcvTq8Q0lyKKNxRlL28Rn6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
359 ms
sdk.js
1156 ms
ca-pub-1663331732402238.js
942 ms
zrt_lookup.html
927 ms
show_ads_impl.js
87 ms
analytics.js
71 ms
ads
1007 ms
master.html
735 ms
hovercard.css
248 ms
services.css
299 ms
count.json
246 ms
g.gif
222 ms
graph.facebook.com
318 ms
count.json
229 ms
graph.facebook.com
398 ms
count.json
241 ms
graph.facebook.com
397 ms
count.json
223 ms
graph.facebook.com
394 ms
count.json
256 ms
graph.facebook.com
389 ms
count.json
217 ms
graph.facebook.com
389 ms
count.json
302 ms
graph.facebook.com
387 ms
osd.js
146 ms
g.gif
143 ms
g.gif
144 ms
g.gif
143 ms
g.gif
144 ms
g.gif
163 ms
g.gif
174 ms
g.gif
175 ms
g.gif
175 ms
g.gif
175 ms
g.gif
174 ms
g.gif
175 ms
g.gif
175 ms
g.gif
175 ms
collect
217 ms
g.gif
210 ms
jquery.js
207 ms
91 ms
9981117783721932041
59 ms
abg.js
62 ms
m_js_controller.js
82 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
42 ms
postmessage.js
9 ms
jed.js
10 ms
underscore.min.js
9 ms
xd_arbiter.php
166 ms
xd_arbiter.php
402 ms
x_button_blue2.png
14 ms
s
28 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
26 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
5 ms
72 ms
likes-rest.js
7 ms
23 ms
batch
96 ms
2 ms
noticons.css
12 ms
style.css
4 ms
Noticons.svg
4 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
2 ms
weftyandmash.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
weftyandmash.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
weftyandmash.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weftyandmash.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Weftyandmash.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
weftyandmash.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Weftyandmash. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: