2.3 sec in total
175 ms
1.7 sec
408 ms
Visit weighpack.com now to see the best up-to-date Weigh Pack content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about weighpack.com
WeighPack is the provider of automated primary packaging machines including weighing, filling, bagging, wrapping, conveying and turnkey systems. Learn more.
Visit weighpack.comWe analyzed Weighpack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
weighpack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value4,930 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.142
78/100
15%
Value24.9 s
0/100
10%
175 ms
385 ms
117 ms
127 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Weighpack.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (964 ms) belongs to the original domain Weighpack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 150.3 kB (4%)
3.8 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Weighpack.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.7 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weigh Pack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 64.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.1 kB or 33% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weighpack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (53%)
55
26
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weigh Pack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
weighpack.com
175 ms
www.weighpack.com
385 ms
bootstrap_homepage.css
117 ms
weighpack.css
127 ms
element.js
41 ms
custom.css
112 ms
font-awesome.min.css
4 ms
jquery-1.12.1.min.js
203 ms
cbpHorizontalMenu.min.js
162 ms
bootstrap.min.js
162 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
31 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
bootstrap.js
282 ms
prettyPhoto.css
179 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
282 ms
widgets.js
141 ms
weighpack_logo.png
129 ms
complete%20system%20solutions.jpg
504 ms
weigh%20filling.jpg
460 ms
auger%20dispensing.jpg
498 ms
mixing.jpg
595 ms
Custom%20engineering.jpg
737 ms
flow%20wrapping.jpg
596 ms
stand%20up%20bagging.jpg
681 ms
vertical%20form%20and%20seal.jpg
693 ms
container%20filling.jpg
672 ms
conveyor%20feeding.jpg
707 ms
product%20accumulation.jpg
964 ms
right-arrow.png
729 ms
BEludNtYJgQ.jpg
738 ms
Sx2n0LVuV50.jpg
765 ms
dfLL9L7NjlU.jpg
764 ms
RyhNRXcdPro.jpg
788 ms
agropur.png
811 ms
hershey.png
796 ms
maple%20leaf%20foods.png
826 ms
mars.png
832 ms
pretzels.png
853 ms
saputo.png
859 ms
cargill.png
888 ms
del%20monte.png
885 ms
green%20giant.png
903 ms
translateelement.css
54 ms
main.js
123 ms
ga.js
53 ms
livechatjs.ashx
146 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
49 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
155 ms
element_main.js
52 ms
__utm.gif
59 ms
translate_24dp.png
25 ms
l
44 ms
cleardot.gif
43 ms
collect
73 ms
livechat.ashx
141 ms
te_ctrl3.gif
13 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
48 ms
DBImage.ashx
9 ms
jot
93 ms
weighpack.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
weighpack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
weighpack.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weighpack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Weighpack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
weighpack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Weigh Pack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: