Tools & Wizards About Us
which.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

which.net

which.net has now closed

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

887 ms

Page Rendered

118 ms

which.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to which.net homepage info - get ready to check Which best content for Bangladesh right away, or after learning these important things about which.net

Manage your Which.net email addresses, login to webmail or get assistance with your Which.net service.

Visit which.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Which.net page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

which.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

which.net

172 ms

home.pack.min.css

250 ms

eprivacy.css

193 ms

eprivacy.js

181 ms

logo-online.png

156 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Which.net, 12% (2 requests) were made to Which.co.uk and 6% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (319 ms) belongs to the original domain Which.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 20.9 kB (36%)

Content Size

57.4 kB

After Optimization

36.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Which.net main page is 57.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 28.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 6.4 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 692 B, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 28.1 kB
  • After minification 28.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Which images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 5.8 kB
  • After minification 5.8 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 12.6 kB

  • Original 17.1 kB
  • After minification 16.9 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Which.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (38%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Which. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

which.net

which.net

172 ms

home.pack.min.css

home.pack.min.css

250 ms

eprivacy.css

eprivacy.css

193 ms

eprivacy.js

eprivacy.js

181 ms

logo-online.png

logo-online.png

156 ms

bg-nav-main.png

bg-nav-main.png

157 ms

bg-tab-top-left.png

bg-tab-top-left.png

158 ms

bg-tab-top-right.png

bg-tab-top-right.png

159 ms

bg-subnav-divider.png

bg-subnav-divider.png

159 ms

bg-nav-divider.gif

bg-nav-divider.gif

165 ms

main-news.jpg

main-news.jpg

311 ms

main-status.jpg

main-status.jpg

313 ms

main-logo.jpg

main-logo.jpg

315 ms

bg-page-footer.gif

bg-page-footer.gif

316 ms

strapline.png

strapline.png

319 ms

print.css

print.css

84 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

31 ms

SEO Factors

which.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Which.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Which.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

which.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Which. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: