4.1 sec in total
1.4 sec
2.5 sec
207 ms
Visit wholelivingjournal.com now to see the best up-to-date Whole Living Journal content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wholelivingjournal.com
Visit wholelivingjournal.comWe analyzed Wholelivingjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
wholelivingjournal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
17/100
10%
Value26.8 s
0/100
25%
Value15.0 s
1/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.069
96/100
15%
Value42.5 s
0/100
10%
1414 ms
146 ms
18 ms
147 ms
153 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Wholelivingjournal.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Wholelivingjournal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 529.6 kB (29%)
1.8 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Wholelivingjournal.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whole Living Journal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 254.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 254.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 206.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wholelivingjournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 206.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (75%)
55
14
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whole Living Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wholelivingjournal.com
1414 ms
cff-style.css
146 ms
font-awesome.min.css
18 ms
events_manager.css
147 ms
jc-style.css
153 ms
checkbox.min.css
149 ms
form.min.css
157 ms
bootstrap.min.css
381 ms
font-awesome.min.css
208 ms
style.css
196 ms
widgets.min.css
223 ms
jetpack.css
399 ms
jquery.js
411 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
258 ms
core.min.js
281 ms
widget.min.js
288 ms
position.min.js
313 ms
mouse.min.js
344 ms
sortable.min.js
359 ms
datepicker.min.js
481 ms
menu.min.js
406 ms
autocomplete.min.js
436 ms
resizable.min.js
444 ms
draggable.min.js
462 ms
button.min.js
454 ms
dialog.min.js
474 ms
events-manager.js
552 ms
script.js
529 ms
scripts.js
519 ms
bootstrap.min.js
594 ms
main.min.js
548 ms
nivo-slider.css
500 ms
public.css
613 ms
default.css
651 ms
cff-scripts.js
636 ms
jc-script.js
638 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
gprofiles.js
55 ms
wpgroho.js
592 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
636 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
573 ms
cropped-WLJLogo_website_FINAL_teal_1.gif
209 ms
Conscious-Con_MetaSlider-1400x400.jpg
356 ms
BambooStones_MetaSlider-1400x400.jpg
347 ms
Waves_MetaSlider-1400x400.jpg
450 ms
FlowersinToes_MetaSlider-1400x400.jpg
250 ms
Infusion_MetaSlider-1400x400.jpg
501 ms
StonesCandle_MetaSlider-1400x400.jpg
393 ms
JoyStones_MetaSlider_white-1400x400.jpg
397 ms
GirlwithHat_MetaSlider-1400x400.jpg
479 ms
MarApr16-300x300.jpg
407 ms
g.gif
111 ms
hovercard.css
96 ms
services.css
103 ms
arrows.png
227 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
250 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
4 ms
wholelivingjournal.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
wholelivingjournal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wholelivingjournal.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wholelivingjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wholelivingjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wholelivingjournal.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whole Living Journal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: