1.7 sec in total
177 ms
1.3 sec
220 ms
Click here to check amazing Whoseapple content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about whoseapple.org
Facilitating Trauma-Resilient and Trauma-Informed Organizations through Coaching, Consulting, and Speaking.
Visit whoseapple.orgWe analyzed Whoseapple.org page load time and found that the first response time was 177 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
whoseapple.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value131.8 s
0/100
25%
Value18.5 s
0/100
10%
Value15,930 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.037
100/100
15%
Value151.7 s
0/100
10%
177 ms
101 ms
138 ms
83 ms
115 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Whoseapple.org, 76% (29 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (667 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (77%)
2.8 MB
645.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Whoseapple.org main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whoseapple.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (75%)
36
9
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whoseapple. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
whoseapple.org
177 ms
www.whoseapple.org
101 ms
bt
138 ms
require.min.js
83 ms
main-r.min.js
115 ms
viewer.css
86 ms
dynamicmodel
10 ms
c5fe88_5c9b662576baa05c0da75f94d1ace4f1_4966.json.z
667 ms
c5fe88_c5698f82c116eb6b8af1e0fb7ea6dd6e_4961.json.z
661 ms
ugc-viewer
652 ms
ugc-viewer
141 ms
bt
226 ms
skins.min.js
218 ms
components.min.js
133 ms
utils.min.js
77 ms
core.min.js
222 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
219 ms
lodash.min.js
215 ms
TweenMax.min.js
628 ms
layout.min.js
197 ms
tpa.min.js
604 ms
fonts.min.js
597 ms
animations.min.js
597 ms
swfobject.min.js
577 ms
mousetrap.min.js
594 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
601 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
593 ms
react-dom.min.js
600 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
600 ms
widgets.min.js
599 ms
experiment.js
600 ms
render.min.js
606 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
602 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
603 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
598 ms
zepto.min.js
583 ms
color.min.js
576 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
439 ms
whoseapple.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
whoseapple.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
whoseapple.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whoseapple.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Whoseapple.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whoseapple.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whoseapple. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: