4 sec in total
201 ms
3.7 sec
109 ms
Visit wiebetech.com now to see the best up-to-date Wiebe Tech content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wiebetech.com
Find all things WiebeTech including WriteBlockers, RTX, DriveDocks, Ditto Forensic WorkStation, and more.
Visit wiebetech.comWe analyzed Wiebetech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 201 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
wiebetech.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value25.2 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value5,660 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.127
82/100
15%
Value19.9 s
2/100
10%
201 ms
595 ms
53 ms
227 ms
239 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wiebetech.com, 77% (60 requests) were made to Cru-inc.com and 10% (8 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Cru-inc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 854.3 kB (58%)
1.5 MB
617.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Wiebetech.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 616.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 184.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 184.2 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wiebe Tech images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 417.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 417.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 233.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wiebetech.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 233.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (65%)
68
24
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wiebe Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wiebetech.com
201 ms
595 ms
dc.js
53 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
227 ms
CRUPressReleases.css
239 ms
style.css
259 ms
style.css
259 ms
jquery.ad-gallery.css
287 ms
style.css
442 ms
www.cru-inc.com
512 ms
style.css
486 ms
gglcptch.css
488 ms
front-legacy.css
501 ms
jquery-ui.theme.min.css
557 ms
squelch-tabs-and-accordions.css
693 ms
ubermenu.min.css
718 ms
font-awesome.min.css
735 ms
custom.css
758 ms
jquery.js
840 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
788 ms
scripts.js
947 ms
jquery.ad-gallery.js
989 ms
www.cru-inc.com
1052 ms
pinwheel.js
1054 ms
jquery.easing.js
1062 ms
jquery.touchwipe.js
1163 ms
jquery.cycle.js
1215 ms
newscript.js
1265 ms
core.min.js
1272 ms
widget.min.js
1297 ms
accordion.min.js
1322 ms
tabs.min.js
1430 ms
squelch-tabs-and-accordions.js
1460 ms
ubermenu.min.js
1484 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1520 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
style.css
1087 ms
base.css
1158 ms
cru-logo-tag-1.png
219 ms
0.png
229 ms
HEADER2.jpg
148 ms
2-Dittos-10-300x248.png
150 ms
1-USB_3.0_Write-Blocker_web-300x220.png
165 ms
1-Forensic_UltraDock_web-300x210.png
167 ms
rtx.jpg
168 ms
mousejigglers.jpg
192 ms
1-ToughTech-m3-copy-300x147.png
220 ms
vertical-white-bar.gif
254 ms
icon_twitter3.png
255 ms
icon_facebook3.png
255 ms
icon_linkedin3.png
257 ms
icon_youtube3.png
468 ms
icon_instagram3.png
506 ms
466945.js
150 ms
cse.js
255 ms
DividerLine.gif
486 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
625 ms
HEADER2.jpg
524 ms
2-Dittos-10-300x248.png
576 ms
1-USB_3.0_Write-Blocker_web-300x220.png
677 ms
1-Forensic_UltraDock_web-300x210.png
714 ms
rtx.jpg
669 ms
mousejigglers.jpg
765 ms
1-ToughTech-m3-copy-300x147.png
790 ms
jsapi
53 ms
default+en.css
10 ms
default.css
22 ms
default+en.I.js
50 ms
async-ads.js
41 ms
googlelogo_lightgrey_46x16dp.png
51 ms
googlelogo_grey_46x15dp.png
22 ms
search_box_icon.png
22 ms
clear.png
26 ms
print.css
84 ms
__ptq.gif
106 ms
466945.js
40 ms
466945.js
82 ms
leadflows.js
54 ms
wiebetech.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wiebetech.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
wiebetech.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wiebetech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wiebetech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wiebetech.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wiebe Tech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: