2.9 sec in total
728 ms
2 sec
234 ms
Click here to check amazing Wolf content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wolf.org
The International Wolf Center advances the survival of wolf populations by teaching about wolves, their relationship to wildlands and the human role in their future.
Visit wolf.orgWe analyzed Wolf.org page load time and found that the first response time was 728 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
wolf.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value6.4 s
41/100
10%
Value1,160 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
728 ms
25 ms
67 ms
134 ms
135 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Wolf.org, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (728 ms) belongs to the original domain Wolf.org.
Page size can be reduced by 324.0 kB (28%)
1.1 MB
817.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Wolf.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 773.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wolf images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 146.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 146.9 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 79.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wolf.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 79.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (43%)
51
29
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wolf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.wolf.org
728 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
67 ms
styles.css
134 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
135 ms
jquery-ui.css
150 ms
style.css
141 ms
customeditorstyles.css
134 ms
colorbox.css
155 ms
afg.css
193 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
264 ms
flexy-menu.js
196 ms
scripts.js
204 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
247 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
244 ms
mycolorbox.js
258 ms
core.min.js
329 ms
widget.min.js
331 ms
tabs.min.js
333 ms
jquery.form.min.js
331 ms
scripts.js
332 ms
ssba.min.js
333 ms
wp-embed.min.js
358 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
65 ms
dc.js
48 ms
4559-2T.jpg
546 ms
536-2T.gif
683 ms
bckgrndPattern.png
70 ms
topPattern.png
260 ms
searchIcon.png
263 ms
InternationalWolfCenterLogo.png
274 ms
bottomPattern.png
262 ms
24741869632_308bef530d_b.jpg
275 ms
23646908944_82dc4b2e5c_b-1.jpg
645 ms
wcs_12_31_15BZ.jpg
489 ms
image001.jpg
273 ms
4-140.jpg
274 ms
11-140.jpg
334 ms
12-140.jpg
342 ms
6-140.jpg
357 ms
image001-300x169.jpg
343 ms
14444306067_b4752de1a8_b-300x190.jpg
460 ms
sideNav.png
405 ms
followUs.png
410 ms
socialIcons.png
433 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
31 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
44 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
219 ms
__utm.gif
22 ms
ga-audiences
198 ms
bx_loader.gif
215 ms
sliderPager.png
218 ms
startStop.png
260 ms
controls.png
267 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
281 ms
whiteTop.png
288 ms
wolf.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
wolf.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
wolf.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wolf.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wolf.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wolf.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wolf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: