23.3 sec in total
933 ms
15 sec
7.4 sec
Welcome to wordfeud.com homepage info - get ready to check Wordfeud best content for Israel right away, or after learning these important things about wordfeud.com
Visit wordfeud.comWe analyzed Wordfeud.com page load time and found that the first response time was 933 ms and then it took 22.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
wordfeud.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
91/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
933 ms
505 ms
428 ms
428 ms
532 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Wordfeud.com, 27% (16 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 12% (7 requests) were made to Scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 230.4 kB (23%)
998.3 kB
767.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Wordfeud.com main page is 998.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 727.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.7 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wordfeud images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 162.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 162.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wordfeud.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (49%)
59
30
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wordfeud. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wordfeud.com
933 ms
reset.css
505 ms
jquery.superbox.css
428 ms
default.css
428 ms
jquery-1.3.2.js
532 ms
jquery.color.js
410 ms
jquery.equalheights.js
411 ms
jquery.superbox.js
513 ms
smoothscroll.js
705 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
688 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
687 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
754 ms
global.js
611 ms
ga.js
1331 ms
header.jpg
1237 ms
bg0.jpg
1285 ms
phone.png
1286 ms
heading.png
1283 ms
appstore.png
1284 ms
android_market.png
1284 ms
bg1.jpg
1307 ms
bg2.jpg
1305 ms
bg3.jpg
1306 ms
separator.jpg
1306 ms
board_01.th.png
1305 ms
game_list.th.png
1306 ms
new_game.th.png
1398 ms
chat.th.png
1398 ms
dictionaries.th.png
1398 ms
footer.png
1398 ms
likebox.php
2149 ms
__utm.gif
751 ms
7HtPbsreimQ.css
498 ms
sj_IMtt2RWf.css
782 ms
f9mGsFoKGRJ.js
956 ms
JrFVMrRpAYB.js
940 ms
T-D_V7C7Ph6.js
733 ms
iFBP3Ltwel2.js
733 ms
2e4nmgzajeT.js
2767 ms
HNrSbojuFT-.js
2895 ms
unPWtyjsXeq.js
2844 ms
5TmWTVlnCXB.js
2894 ms
I0twv5cR4Lp.js
2765 ms
S9jMCKT8oc5.js
2894 ms
2K9IGvd3K8-.js
3733 ms
16795_481359448569870_169539281_n.png
3392 ms
wMkwmq5_RAN.png
517 ms
314386_269108916461592_82680378_n.jpg
2821 ms
557335_10151002083943870_423650472_n.jpg
3011 ms
312976_10150365353335477_5449353_n.jpg
3136 ms
16114916_10210941943880072_8794328423152906885_n.jpg
2845 ms
13886942_1770731779864607_2467643689328972743_n.jpg
3010 ms
19895029_10155539787951079_651594077384278704_n.jpg
3010 ms
505 ms
ubBsyVhMcc7.png
172 ms
D3za9fCygGK.js
59 ms
nr-1044.min.js
419 ms
tab.js
872 ms
fc3a985901
259 ms
feedback_tab_white.png
203 ms
wordfeud.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
wordfeud.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wordfeud.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wordfeud.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wordfeud.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wordfeud.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wordfeud. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: