Tools & Wizards About Us
workingbird.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

workingbird.co

Loading...

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

632 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

124 ms

workingbird.co screenshot

About Website

Welcome to workingbird.co homepage info - get ready to check Workingbird best content right away, or after learning these important things about workingbird.co

Visit workingbird.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Workingbird.co page load time and found that the first response time was 632 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

workingbird.co performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

workingbird.co

632 ms

WByesyes-04-04.png

82 ms

WByes-04-04.png

140 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

147 ms

css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Workingbird.co, 9% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (647 ms) belongs to the original domain Workingbird.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 614.0 kB (81%)

Content Size

758.5 kB

After Optimization

144.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Workingbird.co main page is 758.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 419.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 14.6 kB
  • After minification 14.3 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 23.7 kB
  • After minification 19.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Workingbird needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 225.6 kB

  • Original 300.5 kB
  • After minification 262.5 kB
  • After compression 74.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 225.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 373.8 kB

  • Original 419.7 kB
  • After minification 370.8 kB
  • After compression 45.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Workingbird.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 373.8 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (68%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Workingbird. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

workingbird.co

workingbird.co

632 ms

WByesyes-04-04.png

WByesyes-04-04.png

82 ms

WByes-04-04.png

WByes-04-04.png

140 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

147 ms

css

css

25 ms

css

css

39 ms

style.css

style.css

515 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

196 ms

shortcodes_responsive.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

134 ms

magnific_popup.css

magnific_popup.css

154 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

302 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

262 ms

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

221 ms

custom.js

custom.js

227 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

261 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

295 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

380 ms

frontend-builder-scripts.js

frontend-builder-scripts.js

647 ms

WB1-02.png

WB1-02.png

76 ms

WB2-02-03.png

WB2-02-03.png

76 ms

MViwy4K6e56oHcyeMzjbCQ.ttf

MViwy4K6e56oHcyeMzjbCQ.ttf

6 ms

F-uvpIj1hF17IDyvQvI50Q.ttf

F-uvpIj1hF17IDyvQvI50Q.ttf

10 ms

SEO Factors

workingbird.co SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Workingbird.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Workingbird.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

workingbird.co

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Workingbird. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: