6.2 sec in total
304 ms
5.3 sec
605 ms
Visit worldoweb.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Worldoweb content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about worldoweb.co.uk
Worldoweb Web Design and Development Resources and Tutorials. Featuring Coding, Security, Windows, Mac, Linux, WordPress, JavaScript, PHP, SEO and Open Source.
Visit worldoweb.co.ukWe analyzed Worldoweb.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
worldoweb.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value3.4 s
65/100
25%
Value3.9 s
83/100
10%
Value720 ms
41/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
304 ms
1262 ms
1321 ms
27 ms
285 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Worldoweb.co.uk, 10% (10 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 10% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Worldoweb.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 352.8 kB (59%)
596.0 kB
243.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Worldoweb.co.uk main page is 596.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 180.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 129.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Worldoweb needs image optimization as it can save up to 45.9 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 109.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.3 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Worldoweb.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 68.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (63%)
82
30
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Worldoweb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.worldoweb.co.uk
304 ms
minify.php
1262 ms
minify.php
1321 ms
css
27 ms
github.css
285 ms
monaco.css
284 ms
gallery.min.css
286 ms
jetpack.css
287 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
6 ms
wp-mailto-links.js
377 ms
custom_script.min.js
378 ms
crayon.min.css
380 ms
photon.js
380 ms
jquery.form.min.js
473 ms
scripts.js
472 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
60 ms
wp-embed.min.js
477 ms
crayon.min.js
476 ms
count.js
566 ms
e-201609.js
4 ms
minify.php
2662 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
115 ms
voucherbin-200.png
200 ms
19692
163 ms
1179
86 ms
wow_mobile.png
263 ms
all.js
34 ms
logo_desktop.png
261 ms
sprites.png
259 ms
absurdidad.png
259 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
49 ms
zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf
126 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
127 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
125 ms
plusone.js
164 ms
search.png
179 ms
187 ms
search-icon.jpg
146 ms
mail-icon-20.png
197 ms
ga.js
62 ms
xd_arbiter.php
51 ms
xd_arbiter.php
112 ms
count.js
78 ms
g.gif
58 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
29 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
52 ms
page
155 ms
collect
65 ms
count-data.js
50 ms
postmessageRelay
38 ms
ga-audiences
41 ms
api.js
43 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
78 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
113 ms
rs=AGLTcCOldiz7BxP14VvzYLiKh1pcAfK41A
11 ms
rs=AGLTcCPhDrHY2vagSjsLFOxeufqSzVU3ow
32 ms
rs=AGLTcCNoZlLNer3iGC1gQ5AmXiIXcp3cwQ
62 ms
photo.jpg
145 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
138 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
162 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
199 ms
rs=AGLTcCNoZlLNer3iGC1gQ5AmXiIXcp3cwQ
28 ms
rs=AGLTcCNoZlLNer3iGC1gQ5AmXiIXcp3cwQ
18 ms
ping
127 ms
300lo.json
41 ms
pinit_main.js
29 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
24 ms
pixel
23 ms
pixel
17 ms
pixel
21 ms
pixel
14 ms
pixel
13 ms
pixel
13 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
match-result
44 ms
match-result
42 ms
match-result
5 ms
pixel
13 ms
like_box.php
158 ms
xYm_UD1pmAz.css
35 ms
TGpOWuX6Pv8.css
40 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
49 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
63 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
62 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
62 ms
601802_10150857252175843_1811869878_n.jpg
55 ms
1234714_10151641842500843_830719211_n.png
12 ms
10641054_753554954718992_5183260064201312555_n.jpg
15 ms
12400909_1662715967347666_5798174765103399568_n.jpg
16 ms
12524044_1038979852814612_5528530077211875790_n.jpg
13 ms
1947785_1571442926478940_6737996075191656579_n.jpg
15 ms
12227662_892162627536095_4752665568534355780_n.jpg
13 ms
12791025_1676180265981212_1825034414297939527_n.jpg
14 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
8 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
8 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
2 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
3 ms
worldoweb.co.uk accessibility score
worldoweb.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
worldoweb.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Worldoweb.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Worldoweb.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
worldoweb.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Worldoweb. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: