Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

worthingtonfire.com

Slot Pulsa: Situs Slot Deposit Pulsa Tanpa Potongan | Link Slot Pulsa

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

16 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

901 ms

worthingtonfire.com screenshot

About Website

Visit worthingtonfire.com now to see the best up-to-date Worthingtonfire content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about worthingtonfire.com

Situs slot pulsa menyediakan game slot gacor hari ini. Daftar judi slot pulsa 5000 melalui situs slot deposit pulsa tanpa potongan sekarang juga.

Visit worthingtonfire.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Worthingtonfire.com page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

worthingtonfire.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value290 ms

80/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

worthingtonfire.com

16 ms

www.amfireandems.org

325 ms

www.mowwvandenberg.org

281 ms

eitiec.org

320 ms

www.kimsdubai.com

362 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Worthingtonfire.com, 81% (42 requests) were made to Nothuman.jowissa.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Kimsdubai.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (472 ms) relates to the external source Nothuman.jowissa.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 97.0 kB (53%)

Content Size

183.6 kB

After Optimization

86.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Worthingtonfire.com main page is 183.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 110.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 87.5 kB

  • Original 110.1 kB
  • After minification 99.0 kB
  • After compression 22.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 73.5 kB
  • After minification 73.5 kB
  • After compression 63.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (50%)

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Worthingtonfire. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

worthingtonfire.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

worthingtonfire.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

worthingtonfire.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    ID

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Worthingtonfire.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Worthingtonfire.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Worthingtonfire. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: