1.5 sec in total
430 ms
761 ms
293 ms
Welcome to wpmaintainer.com homepage info - get ready to check WP Maintainer best content for Morocco right away, or after learning these important things about wpmaintainer.com
Save time & money with our on-demand team. Support you can trust for WordPress updates, backups, security, code fixes & more.
Visit wpmaintainer.comWe analyzed Wpmaintainer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 430 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
wpmaintainer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value3.9 s
51/100
25%
Value2.3 s
99/100
10%
Value140 ms
95/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.9 s
96/100
10%
430 ms
54 ms
65 ms
90 ms
65 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Wpmaintainer.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (430 ms) belongs to the original domain Wpmaintainer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 220.9 kB (43%)
518.9 kB
298.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Wpmaintainer.com main page is 518.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 255.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.3 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, WP Maintainer needs image optimization as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 116.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 116.6 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wpmaintainer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (36%)
33
21
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WP Maintainer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wpmaintainer.com
430 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
54 ms
pagenavi-css.css
65 ms
style.css
90 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
65 ms
jquery.js
159 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
66 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
86 ms
plugins.js
98 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
125 ms
main.js
99 ms
normalize.css
34 ms
css
28 ms
ga.js
36 ms
bg-noise.jpg
69 ms
logo.png
33 ms
bg-home-tmp.jpg
64 ms
price-tag-99-green.png
33 ms
icon-alarm-lg.png
33 ms
icon-safe-lg.png
31 ms
icon-sucuri-lg.png
63 ms
icon-lorry.png
64 ms
icon-alert.png
66 ms
icon-group.png
65 ms
icon-dig.png
93 ms
bio-pic-gear-cover-white.png
91 ms
bio-pic-andy.png
123 ms
bio-pic-drew.png
125 ms
bio-pic-rob.png
127 ms
logo-footer.png
99 ms
social-icon-twitter.png
120 ms
social-icon-facebook.png
121 ms
0665.js
104 ms
MG9KbUZFchDs94Tbv9U-paCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
16 ms
uDssvmXgp7Nj3i336k_dSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
15 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
wpmaintainer.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
wpmaintainer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
wpmaintainer.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wpmaintainer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wpmaintainer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wpmaintainer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of WP Maintainer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: